[R-meta] Converting smd to r-coefficients
Dear Tarun, For the first set of studies: How did you actually calculate a correlation coefficient? Did the authors that conducted these regression analyses also report correlation coefficients or did you use some kind of conversion equation? If so, which? Also, are the two variables for which you computed a correlation coefficient continuous variables or was one of the two actually a dichotomous variable that corresponds to the grouping variable based on which the SMD values for the second set of studies were computed? And how did you transform the standardized mean differences into correlations? The usual equation that one can find in textbooks for this purpose yields a point-biserial correlation coefficient. That is not comparable to a correlation coefficient based on two continuous variables. If one can reasonably assume that the variable that creates the two groups is actually a dichotomized version of some latent continuous variable, then one can convert a SMD value also into a biserial correlation coefficient. The latter will be larger, which might explain why you find that negative coefficient in your meta-regression model. The following article discusses the transformation of SMD values to biserial correlations: Jacobs, P., & Viechtbauer, W. (2017). Estimation of the biserial correlation and its sampling variance for use in meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods, 8(2), 161-180. Best, Wolfgang
-----Original Message----- From: R-sig-meta-analysis [mailto:r-sig-meta-analysis-bounces at r-project.org] On Behalf Of Tarun Khanna Sent: Wednesday, 07 October, 2020 21:06 To: r-sig-meta-analysis at r-project.org Subject: [R-meta] Converting smd to r-coefficients Dear all, In the meta regression that I am conducting, there were two types of primary studies. One that employed regression analysis and others that employed a difference of means test. I calculated an r coefficient for the first set of studies and standardised mean differences for the second set and then converted these into r coefficients. I conducted the final analysis on r coefficients. In the meta regression models I added ?statistical technique? as a moderator variable and the coefficient of the variable signifying mean differences studies is significantly negative. I'm not sure if this difference being captured in the regression is on account of difference in the underlying studies or whether conversion of smd to r coefficients might have somehow biased estimates from the second set of studies downwards. Is this this possible? What can I do to check? Best regards Tarun Tarun Khanna Research Associate Hertie School Friedrichstra?e 180 10117 Berlin ? Germany khanna at hertie-school.org ? www.hertie-school.org<http://www.hertie- school.org/>