Skip to content
Prev 957 / 5632 Next

[R-meta] Fwd: SV: Re:: Question: Metafor R package - rma and rma.mv function

Dear Michael,



Thank you for your fast reply. It is very appreciated. I should have changed it to plain text now.



Maybe I?am not quite aware of how this is computed. The model that I am fitting is it as follows: yi = mean + uj[i] + ei for the i?th comparison and the j?th study when using the rma.mv function? And how is the weights applied to it or calculated?



I tried to use the profile.rma.mv() function and I got one maxima. Can I then assume that it is converged?



Best wishes,

Simona



________________________________
Fra: Michael Dewey <lists at dewey.myzen.co.uk<mailto:lists at dewey.myzen.co.uk>>
Sendt: Wednesday, July 25, 2018 3:06:06 PM
Til: Simona Frederiksen; r-sig-meta-analysis at r-project.org<mailto:r-sig-meta-analysis at r-project.org>
Emne: Re:: [R-meta] Question: Metafor R package - rma and rma.mv function

Simona Frederiksen <simona.frederiksen at hotmail.com<mailto:simona.frederiksen at hotmail.com>> wrote :

Dear Simona

Given the calculated variances (vi) the weights seem quite OK to me.

Would the question underlying the convergence issue be better answered by using profile.rma.mv()?

Please set your mailer to post in plain text not HTML as your post got mangled which made running your example rather tricky.

Michael.

  
  
Message-ID: <AM0PR08MB3313933F2C2B1273AA864F548E540@AM0PR08MB3313.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <AM0PR08MB3313F8861869D0384C806A408E540@AM0PR08MB3313.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>