Skip to content
Prev 2637 / 5636 Next

[R-meta] Meta-Analisys whit events numbers, RR, OR and HR. It's possibe?

Am 29.01.21 um 16:29 schrieb Martin Lobo:
Dear Martin,

Tierney et al. (2007) describe why using event numbers or odds ratios / 
risk ratios for time-to-event data can be problematic. Accordingly, I 
would recommend to base the main analysis on studies providing hazard 
ratios and to consider the meta-analysis of hazard and odds ratios as a 
sensitivity analysis (with subgroups defined by effect measure).
First, you are taking double logs for hazard ratios. Second, as 
mentioned above, I would conduct a subgroup analysis:

HR?????? <- c(1.05, 0.44, 0.31, 0.77, 0.47, 0.77, 0.72)
lower.HR <- c(0.65, 0.16, 0.09, 0.68, 0.24, 0.52, 0.55)
upper.HR <- c(1.69, 1.22, 1.01, 0.87, 0.91, 0.81, 0.89)
##
effect.measure <- rep(c("HR", "OR"), c(4, 3))
##
metagen(log(HR), lower = log(lower.HR), upper = log(upper.HR),
 ??????? sm = "HR", byvar = effect.measure)
If the hazard ratio for group B vs A is 'x' than the hazard ratio for A 
vs B is '1 / x'. Accordingly, you can calculate the hazard ratio for 
statins vs no statins as 1 / 2.17. The lower confidence limit is 1 / 
4.54 and the upper limit is 1 / 1.04.

Best wishes,
Guido

Reference:

Tierney JF, Stewart LA, Ghersi D, Burdett S, Sydes MR. Practical methods 
for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis. Trials. 
2007;8:16.