[R-meta] conversion of OR to tetrachoric corr and its var
Thank you!, I'll check it out. On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 11:19?AM Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (NP) <
wolfgang.viechtbauer at maastrichtuniversity.nl> wrote:
Hi Eran, See: https://wviechtb.github.io/metafor/reference/conv.delta.html and especially the example at the very end, which directly covers your question. Briefly, after conv.wald(), you use conv.delta() to convert the log odds ratio and its sampling variance to the tetrachoric correlation with its sampling variance. Best, Wolfgang
-----Original Message----- From: R-sig-meta-analysis <r-sig-meta-analysis-bounces at r-project.org>
On Behalf
Of Eran Barzilai via R-sig-meta-analysis Sent: Friday, March 15, 2024 16:05 To: r-sig-meta-analysis at r-project.org Cc: Eran Barzilai <barze445 at newschool.edu> Subject: [R-meta] conversion of OR to tetrachoric corr and its var Hello, Thank you for this great resource! I am working on a meta-analysis in clinical psychology where I compare if different types of childhood adverse experiences have different associations with later in life psychopathology. To do that I combine effect size that comes from Pearson?s r correlation, (log) odd-ratios, and mean differences (Cohen?s D). Since all the
measures
are clinical, I assume all are continuous variables regardless of if they were artificially dichotomized or not. My question is mostly about conversions of OR to the tetrachoric correlation. Most of the studies report the 2X2 table, allowing me to calculate the tetrachoric correlation directly using metafor?s escalc() function. However, some only report the OR and its CI. For these studies use metafor?sconv.wald() to calculate the log odd-ratios and their sampling variance. Then I can metafor?s transf.lnortortet.pearson() to convert the log odd-ratios to tetrachoric correlation. However, does it make sense to also use this function directly on the log-odds variance to convert it to the variance of the tetrachoric correlation? Alternatively, I thought of converting the log odd-ratios I calculate
from
conv.wald() to d, and then to the biserial correlations. Will this method produce more reliable estimation of the effect-size and its variance? Thank you for your help, Eran -- Eran Barzilai, Ph.D., New School for Social Research Clinical Psychologist Postdoc, Williamsburg Therapy Group https://williamsburgtherapygroup.com/ Part-time Faculty, The New School, Schools of Public Engagement,
Bachelor's
Program for Adults and Transfer Students Pronouns: he, him, his
Eran Barzilai, Ph.D., New School for Social Research Clinical Psychologist Postdoc, Williamsburg Therapy Group https://williamsburgtherapygroup.com/ Part-time Faculty, The New School, Schools of Public Engagement, Bachelor's Program for Adults and Transfer Students Pronouns: he, him, his [[alternative HTML version deleted]]