[R-meta] Heterogeneity and moderated mediation
It is hard to comment in detail as we do not have any information about the meta-analysis you ran. Are there two separate analyses, one for groups and one for individuals, two separate data-sets, one for groups and one for individuals, or one analysis using a multi-level meta-analysis? Presumably that is all replicated four times for each PSC (whatever that is) but that could equally be another level in the multi-level mode. Would the nature of the research environment and study design have caused you to believe that heterogeneity was expected or unlikely? Michael
On 28/02/2022 06:50, Amy Zadow wrote:
Hello, I am seeking advice about my current results ? any comments/criticism/advice around the heterogeneity statistics would be very helpful Also I would be keen to conduct a moderated mediation but not sure where to start. Any advice/ recommended resources or code would be much appreciated. Many thanks, Amy
> _______________________________________________ > R-sig-meta-analysis mailing list > R-sig-meta-analysis at r-project.org
<mailto:R-sig-meta-analysis at r-project.org>
>
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
_______________________________________________ R-sig-meta-analysis mailing list R-sig-meta-analysis at r-project.org <mailto:R-sig-meta-analysis at r-project.org> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-meta-analysis <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-meta-analysis> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> Virus-free. www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> _______________________________________________ R-sig-meta-analysis mailing list R-sig-meta-analysis at r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-meta-analysis