[R-meta] Raw OR and adjusted OR. Sample Size Adjusted in meta-analisys
Dears Michel and Wolfgang: Thankyou for your answers. I have seen several meta-analysis publications with adjusted summary measures. These meta-analyzes are not individual data. I attach a meta-analysis of what I want to do to clarify the idea of what I'm trying to do. best regards Lorenzo Mart?n Lobo MTSAC, FACC, FESC Especialista Jerarquizado en Cardiolog?a Jefe de Cardiolog?a Hospital Militar Campo de Mayo Ex Jefe de Unidad Coronaria Hospital Militar Campo de Mayo Miembro Titular de la Sociedad Argentina de Cardiolog?a Fellow American College of Cardiology Fellow European Society of Cardiology Miembro del Area de Investigaci?n de la SAC Ex Director del Consejo de Aterosclerosis y Trombosis de la SAC Miembro Asesor del Consejo de Aterosclerosis y Trombosis de la SAC Ex Director del Consejo de Epidemiolog?a y Prevenci?n Cardiovascular de la SAC Miembro Asesor del Consejo de Epidemiolog?a y Prevenci?n Cardiovascular de la SAC Instructor de ACLS de la American Heart Association
De: R-sig-meta-analysis <r-sig-meta-analysis-bounces at r-project.org> en nombre de r-sig-meta-analysis-request at r-project.org <r-sig-meta-analysis-request at r-project.org>
Enviado: lunes, 18 de marzo de 2019 13:18
Para: r-sig-meta-analysis at r-project.org
Asunto: R-sig-meta-analysis Digest, Vol 22, Issue 18
Send R-sig-meta-analysis mailing list submissions to
r-sig-meta-analysis at r-project.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstat.ethz.ch%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fr-sig-meta-analysis&data=02%7C01%7C%7C3bdf0b5d19e8430ad5ed08d6abbd6891%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636885227320789567&sdata=qLlwmGzFzHUhZuoq2w9ke7PKt0yjPUGgN63NmpptJoc%3D&reserved=0
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
r-sig-meta-analysis-request at r-project.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
r-sig-meta-analysis-owner at r-project.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of R-sig-meta-analysis digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: R-sig-meta-analysis Digest, Vol 22, Issue 17 (Martin Lobo)
2. Re: doubt about meta analysis (Martin Lobo)
3. Re: doubt about meta analysis (Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (SP))
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 15:51:56 +0000
From: Martin Lobo <mlobo4370 at hotmail.com>
To: "r-sig-meta-analysis-request at r-project.org"
<r-sig-meta-analysis-request at r-project.org>,
"r-sig-meta-analysis at r-project.org"
<r-sig-meta-analysis at r-project.org>
Subject: Re: [R-meta] R-sig-meta-analysis Digest, Vol 22, Issue 17
Message-ID:
<MN2PR20MB28141D4DD38574420411E625AC470 at MN2PR20MB2814.namprd20.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Dear Michael, thank you for answering, this technique has been used for several years, and in general the original publications do not include the adjusted values. Imagine that it would be very difficult for all publications to include adjustment for the variables that interest us. Even some meta-analyzes adjust for years of publication, something interesting due to changes in the way patients are treated year after year.
Lorenzo Mart?n Lobo MTSAC, FACC, FESC
Especialista Jerarquizado en Cardiolog?a
Ex Jefe de Unidad Coronaria
Hospital Militar Campo de Mayo
Miembro Titular de la Sociedad Argentina de Cardiolog?a
Fellow American College of Cardiology
Fellow European Society of Cardiology
Miembro del Area de Investigaci?n de la SAC
Director del Consejo de Aterosclerosis y Trombosis de la SAC
Ex Director y actual Miembro Asesor del Consejo de Epidemiolog?a y Prevenci?n Cardiovascular de la SAC
Instructor de ACLS de la AHA para la Fundaci?n Cardiol?gica Argentina
________________________________
De: R-sig-meta-analysis <r-sig-meta-analysis-bounces at r-project.org> en nombre de r-sig-meta-analysis-request at r-project.org <r-sig-meta-analysis-request at r-project.org>
Enviado: lunes, 18 de marzo de 2019 08:07
Para: r-sig-meta-analysis at r-project.org
Asunto: R-sig-meta-analysis Digest, Vol 22, Issue 17
Send R-sig-meta-analysis mailing list submissions to
r-sig-meta-analysis at r-project.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Feur04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com%2F%3Furl%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fstat.ethz.ch%252Fmailman%252Flistinfo%252Fr-sig-meta-analysis%26data%3D02%257C01%257C%257C1a79c51562604cd6f03008d6ab922a41%257C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%257C1%257C0%257C636885041586795971%26sdata%3DHnbhaGcf9O4ITSdnmYNvkphnxgkZSxTHsg%252FDtVx%252FZ3Y%253D%26reserved%3D0&data=02%7C01%7C%7C3bdf0b5d19e8430ad5ed08d6abbd6891%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636885227320789567&sdata=S5aLUtlp1g%2BSAW3hrwh7rnLIaLKiJvnwisXae2Vo700%3D&reserved=0
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
r-sig-meta-analysis-request at r-project.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
r-sig-meta-analysis-owner at r-project.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of R-sig-meta-analysis digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: doubt about meta analysis (Michael Dewey)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2019 16:13:22 +0000
From: Michael Dewey <lists at dewey.myzen.co.uk>
To: Martin Lobo <mlobo4370 at hotmail.com>,
"r-sig-meta-analysis at r-project.org"
<r-sig-meta-analysis at r-project.org>
Subject: Re: [R-meta] doubt about meta analysis
Message-ID: <56fe7327-206b-fa39-1be2-57a11083cb93 at dewey.myzen.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
Dear Martin
Unless either (a) the primary studies have published the adjusted OR, or
(b) you have the original data and can calculate it then I think the
answer is that waht you want to do is not possible.
Michael
On 17/03/2019 06:41, Martin Lobo wrote:
> Hi, my name is martin lobo. I?m cardiologist from argentina.
> I would like to ask you a question. I am wanting to do a meta analysis with the meta and metafor packages in R. I have not managed to adjust the odds ratio for certain covariates. That is, I need part of the crude OR, an adjusted OR for example, by age, cholesterol, sex, etc. Could I be oriented to achieve this type of adjustment in the meta analysis?
> From already thank you very much
>
> Lorenzo Mart?n Lobo MTSAC, FACC, FESC
> Especialista Jerarquizado en Cardiolog?a
> Ex Jefe de Unidad Coronaria
> Hospital Militar Campo de Mayo
> Miembro Titular de la Sociedad Argentina de Cardiolog?a
> Fellow American College of Cardiology
> Fellow European Society of Cardiology
> Miembro del Area de Investigaci?n de la SAC
> Director del Consejo de Aterosclerosis y Trombosis de la SAC
> Ex Director y actual Miembro Asesor del Consejo de Epidemiolog?a y Prevenci?n Cardiovascular de la SAC
>
> Instructor de ACLS de la AHA para la Fundaci?n Cardiol?gica Argentina
>
>
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> R-sig-meta-analysis mailing list
> R-sig-meta-analysis at r-project.org
> https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Feur04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com%2F%3Furl%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fstat.ethz.ch%252Fmailman%252Flistinfo%252Fr-sig-meta-analysis%26data%3D02%257C01%257C%257C1a79c51562604cd6f03008d6ab922a41%257C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%257C1%257C0%257C636885041586795971%26sdata%3DHnbhaGcf9O4ITSdnmYNvkphnxgkZSxTHsg%252FDtVx%252FZ3Y%253D%26reserved%3D0&data=02%7C01%7C%7C3bdf0b5d19e8430ad5ed08d6abbd6891%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636885227320789567&sdata=S5aLUtlp1g%2BSAW3hrwh7rnLIaLKiJvnwisXae2Vo700%3D&reserved=0
>
--
Michael
https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Feur04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com%2F%3Furl%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.dewey.myzen.co.uk%252Fhome.html%26data%3D02%257C01%257C%257C1a79c51562604cd6f03008d6ab922a41%257C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%257C1%257C0%257C636885041586795971%26sdata%3Dcsxjd9UY2MFE0VDiq1yUX3gmW8Akmf5DfQtiJF%252Bnp3M%253D%26reserved%3D0&data=02%7C01%7C%7C3bdf0b5d19e8430ad5ed08d6abbd6891%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636885227320799578&sdata=%2Fzg%2B3nuD%2BQLFMNg%2FDglYZa6mzVZ5Gg%2FZOk1eMgaY7xU%3D&reserved=0
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
R-sig-meta-analysis mailing list
R-sig-meta-analysis at r-project.org
https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Feur04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com%2F%3Furl%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fstat.ethz.ch%252Fmailman%252Flistinfo%252Fr-sig-meta-analysis%26data%3D02%257C01%257C%257C1a79c51562604cd6f03008d6ab922a41%257C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%257C1%257C0%257C636885041586795971%26sdata%3DHnbhaGcf9O4ITSdnmYNvkphnxgkZSxTHsg%252FDtVx%252FZ3Y%253D%26reserved%3D0&data=02%7C01%7C%7C3bdf0b5d19e8430ad5ed08d6abbd6891%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636885227320799578&sdata=dUTX1orxNrQDZ%2FYVO40wsZNwGEokVlvRwmx73NZnZ7Y%3D&reserved=0
------------------------------
End of R-sig-meta-analysis Digest, Vol 22, Issue 17
***************************************************
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 15:52:28 +0000
From: Martin Lobo <mlobo4370 at hotmail.com>
To: Michael Dewey <lists at dewey.myzen.co.uk>,
"r-sig-meta-analysis at r-project.org"
<r-sig-meta-analysis at r-project.org>
Subject: Re: [R-meta] doubt about meta analysis
Message-ID:
<MN2PR20MB2814A1824A2FC8934E97BA24AC470 at MN2PR20MB2814.namprd20.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Dear Michael, thank you for answering, this technique has been used for several years, and in general the original publications do not include the adjusted values. Imagine that it would be very difficult for all publications to include adjustment for the variables that interest us. Even some meta-analyzes adjust for years of publication, something interesting due to changes in the way patients are treated year after year.
Lorenzo Mart?n Lobo MTSAC, FACC, FESC
Especialista Jerarquizado en Cardiolog?a
Ex Jefe de Unidad Coronaria
Hospital Militar Campo de Mayo
Miembro Titular de la Sociedad Argentina de Cardiolog?a
Fellow American College of Cardiology
Fellow European Society of Cardiology
Miembro del Area de Investigaci?n de la SAC
Director del Consejo de Aterosclerosis y Trombosis de la SAC
Ex Director y actual Miembro Asesor del Consejo de Epidemiolog?a y Prevenci?n Cardiovascular de la SAC
Instructor de ACLS de la AHA para la Fundaci?n Cardiol?gica Argentina
________________________________
De: Michael Dewey <lists at dewey.myzen.co.uk>
Enviado: domingo, 17 de marzo de 2019 13:13
Para: Martin Lobo; r-sig-meta-analysis at r-project.org
Asunto: Re: [R-meta] doubt about meta analysis
Dear Martin
Unless either (a) the primary studies have published the adjusted OR, or
(b) you have the original data and can calculate it then I think the
answer is that waht you want to do is not possible.
Michael
On 17/03/2019 06:41, Martin Lobo wrote:
> Hi, my name is martin lobo. I?m cardiologist from argentina.
> I would like to ask you a question. I am wanting to do a meta analysis with the meta and metafor packages in R. I have not managed to adjust the odds ratio for certain covariates. That is, I need part of the crude OR, an adjusted OR for example, by age, cholesterol, sex, etc. Could I be oriented to achieve this type of adjustment in the meta analysis?
> From already thank you very much
>
> Lorenzo Mart?n Lobo MTSAC, FACC, FESC
> Especialista Jerarquizado en Cardiolog?a
> Ex Jefe de Unidad Coronaria
> Hospital Militar Campo de Mayo
> Miembro Titular de la Sociedad Argentina de Cardiolog?a
> Fellow American College of Cardiology
> Fellow European Society of Cardiology
> Miembro del Area de Investigaci?n de la SAC
> Director del Consejo de Aterosclerosis y Trombosis de la SAC
> Ex Director y actual Miembro Asesor del Consejo de Epidemiolog?a y Prevenci?n Cardiovascular de la SAC
>
> Instructor de ACLS de la AHA para la Fundaci?n Cardiol?gica Argentina
>
>
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> R-sig-meta-analysis mailing list
> R-sig-meta-analysis at r-project.org
> https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstat.ethz.ch%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fr-sig-meta-analysis&data=02%7C01%7C%7C3bdf0b5d19e8430ad5ed08d6abbd6891%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636885227320799578&sdata=QSDqqdn%2FNaPnGKEjxflGp83C2MK3FyL%2B4l5rMVVTlbA%3D&reserved=0
>
--
Michael
https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dewey.myzen.co.uk%2Fhome.html&data=02%7C01%7C%7C3bdf0b5d19e8430ad5ed08d6abbd6891%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636885227320809583&sdata=A6SXn%2BpgGkDOIuXilLi%2BWTwli3XqYdyfAqKTQttlv5Y%3D&reserved=0
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 16:07:17 +0000
From: "Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (SP)"
<wolfgang.viechtbauer at maastrichtuniversity.nl>
To: Martin Lobo <mlobo4370 at hotmail.com>, Michael Dewey
<lists at dewey.myzen.co.uk>, "r-sig-meta-analysis at r-project.org"
<r-sig-meta-analysis at r-project.org>
Subject: Re: [R-meta] doubt about meta analysis
Message-ID: <cd858502d4544fee9c8fc6cc37942413 at UM-MAIL3214.unimaas.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Dear Lorenzo,
It isn't clear to me what exactly it is that you are after. As Michael said, only the primary studies can provide adjusted ORs (or if you had the raw data and would do an 'individual patient data meta-analysis'). Of course, one can include predictors ('moderators') in a meta-regression model, but that isn't the same thing as adjusting ORs based on individual patient data.
To use the example of using publication year as a moderator:
### load metafor package
library(metafor)
### calculate log odds ratios and corresponding sampling variances
dat <- escalc(measure="OR", ai=tpos, bi=tneg, ci=cpos, di=cneg, data=dat.bcg)
### meta-regression model with 'year' as moderator
res <- rma(yi, vi, mods = ~ year, data=dat)
res
One can compute predicted ORs at various values of 'year' now. For example:
### predicted OR in 1966
predict(res, newmods=1966, transf=exp)
I wouldn't call this an 'adjusted' OR though. It is simply the predicted OR in 1966 based on this model.
Best,
Wolfgang
-----Original Message-----
From: R-sig-meta-analysis [mailto:r-sig-meta-analysis-bounces at r-project.org] On Behalf Of Martin Lobo
Sent: Monday, 18 March, 2019 16:52
To: Michael Dewey; r-sig-meta-analysis at r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R-meta] doubt about meta analysis
Dear Michael, thank you for answering, this technique has been used for several years, and in general the original publications do not include the adjusted values. Imagine that it would be very difficult for all publications to include adjustment for the variables that interest us. Even some meta-analyzes adjust for years of publication, something interesting due to changes in the way patients are treated year after year.
Lorenzo Mart?n Lobo MTSAC, FACC, FESC
Especialista Jerarquizado en Cardiolog?a
Ex Jefe de Unidad Coronaria
Hospital Militar Campo de Mayo
Miembro Titular de la Sociedad Argentina de Cardiolog?a
Fellow American College of Cardiology
Fellow European Society of Cardiology
Miembro del Area de Investigaci?n de la SAC
Director del Consejo de Aterosclerosis y Trombosis de la SAC
Ex Director y actual Miembro Asesor del Consejo de Epidemiolog?a y Prevenci?n Cardiovascular de la SAC
Instructor de ACLS de la AHA para la Fundaci?n Cardiol?gica Argentina
________________________________
De: Michael Dewey <lists at dewey.myzen.co.uk>
Enviado: domingo, 17 de marzo de 2019 13:13
Para: Martin Lobo; r-sig-meta-analysis at r-project.org
Asunto: Re: [R-meta] doubt about meta analysis
Dear Martin
Unless either (a) the primary studies have published the adjusted OR, or
(b) you have the original data and can calculate it then I think the
answer is that waht you want to do is not possible.
Michael
On 17/03/2019 06:41, Martin Lobo wrote:
> Hi, my name is martin lobo. I?m cardiologist from argentina.
> I would like to ask you a question. I am wanting to do a meta analysis with the meta and metafor packages in R. I have not managed to adjust the odds ratio for certain covariates. That is, I need part of the crude OR, an adjusted OR for example, by age, cholesterol, sex, etc. Could I be oriented to achieve this type of adjustment in the meta analysis?
> From already thank you very much
>
> Lorenzo Mart?n Lobo MTSAC, FACC, FESC
> Especialista Jerarquizado en Cardiolog?a
> Ex Jefe de Unidad Coronaria
> Hospital Militar Campo de Mayo
> Miembro Titular de la Sociedad Argentina de Cardiolog?a
> Fellow American College of Cardiology
> Fellow European Society of Cardiology
> Miembro del Area de Investigaci?n de la SAC
> Director del Consejo de Aterosclerosis y Trombosis de la SAC
> Ex Director y actual Miembro Asesor del Consejo de Epidemiolog?a y Prevenci?n Cardiovascular de la SAC
>
> Instructor de ACLS de la AHA para la Fundaci?n Cardiol?gica Argentina
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
R-sig-meta-analysis mailing list
R-sig-meta-analysis at r-project.org
https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstat.ethz.ch%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fr-sig-meta-analysis&data=02%7C01%7C%7C3bdf0b5d19e8430ad5ed08d6abbd6891%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636885227320809583&sdata=EFIWjJ0RSMreY4B2uBWv9zQ6T0k6uF%2FFtEBLKoUmQz0%3D&reserved=0
------------------------------
End of R-sig-meta-analysis Digest, Vol 22, Issue 18
***************************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-meta-analysis/attachments/20190408/482eea75/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Association Between Baseline LDL-C Level and Total.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 411568 bytes
Desc: Association Between Baseline LDL-C Level and Total.pdf
URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-meta-analysis/attachments/20190408/482eea75/attachment-0001.pdf>