Dear all, I hope this email finds you well. I am interested in analysing longitudinal studies where a particular group of individuals (diagnosed at time 1) is followed across time and then have their skills measured at some later date (follow-up - time 2). I am not interested in estimating the difference in skills between time points, but instead, I want to determine which factors measured at time 1 (e.g., gender, age) predict their skills at time 2. Assuming the models would be regressions where the outcome variable at time 2 is predicted by each factor at time 1 independently, could we use cohen's f as the effect size for the meta-analysis and then run a meta-regression to see which factors explain the most variance and which combinations lead to more explanatory power? (e.g., voc ~ gender + SES). If this is completely wrong, could you please point me to a study that has examined similar questions? The dataset I am imagining would look something like this: Study | Moderator | cohen's f | Outcome S1 | gender | .23 | voc S1 | SES | .12 | voc S2| gender | .02 | voc Thank you!
[R-meta] predictors of longitudinal outcomes
1 message · Catia Oliveira