Skip to content

[R-meta] Exponentiating the fixed part of rma.mv output

8 messages · Wolfgang Viechtbauer, Stefanou Revesz, Gerta Ruecker

Stefanou Revesz
# 
Hello Wolfgang,

I want to exponentiate the fixed part of my model below, is there a
way to preserve the appearance of the output as in
`coef(summary(res))` but just display all the columns in their
exponentiated form?

I did try `predict(res, transf = exp)` but that is not what I'm after.

Thank you,
Stefanou

## Here is my model:
d <- read.csv("https://raw.githubusercontent.com/fpqq/w/main/f.csv")

res <- rma.mv(gi ~ teaching_level+pd_format +pd_content +
                 training_hr +time +outcome +area +
                 time_wk_whn +time_wk_btw +study_type,
               V = v_gi,
               random = ~1|study/obs,
               data = d)
Wolfgang Viechtbauer
# 
Dear Stefanou,

When posting to the mailing list, please provide some information about any institutional/organizational affiliation (such as a link to a personal website, university profile page, or social media profile). Thanks!

Best,
Wolfgang
Stefanou Revesz
# 
Hello Wolfgang,

I'm a second second year master's student in psychology at the
University College of London. I don't currently own a social media
platform or personal website (I certainly should set up one for myself
when I start to publish!). To be clear, are you asking that I should
add this information to my signature at the bottom of my gmail in my
future posts, correct?

Sincerely,
Stefanou



On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 3:05 PM Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (SP)
<wolfgang.viechtbauer at maastrichtuniversity.nl> wrote:
Wolfgang Viechtbauer
# 
Is there any way this can be verified? Easiest would be to use your UCL account to post.

Best,
Wolfgang
Stefanou Revesz
# 
Sure, it's alway been easier to use a personal account for a
non-university business but if needed (which I honestly didn't know)
in the future posts I will subscribe using my UCL account.

At any rate, thanks,
Stefanou

On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 3:54 PM Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (SP)
<wolfgang.viechtbauer at maastrichtuniversity.nl> wrote:
Gerta Ruecker
# 
Dear Wolfgang,

I read your recent post on these more general rules for the list and I 
agree with most of them. However, I have a problem with this bashing of 
people who do not have an official address. I worked for full 12 years 
as a German Hausfrau from home. I was nowhere affiliated, but 
nevertheless published as a researcher, together with my husband and his 
colleagues. At that time I even didn't have an e-mail address. Now I am 
retired, and when my contract as a guest scientist will end, I will lose 
my e-mail address and my affiliation and, if these are the rules, will 
not be allowed to post on this list. Please be aware that there are 
people who retire, or get unemployed, but still do research.

In short, why does it matter where we are affiliated?

Best,

Gerta

Am 29.03.2022 um 22:54 schrieb Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (SP):

  
    

      
      
    

  


  


      

    

    

      
      

        


  

        

      Wolfgang Viechtbauer
    

    

      
      #
    

  


  

      
Dear Gerta,

I don't think I am bashing anybody and I am sorry if it came across this way. Anybody is free to post here. It's just nice to know who I am conversing with, especially if a post is addressing me directly.

Best,
Wolfgang

            

      
      
      
    

  
  


  


      

    

    

      
      

        


  

        

      Gerta Ruecker
    

    

      
      #
    

  


  

      
Dear Wolfgang,

Thank you for your quick response and clarifying this. My post was 
caused by your question to Stefanou. I would have thought that if 
someone explains their status being a second year's student, we simply 
believe him (or her) instead of asking "Is there any way this can be 
verified?"

Best,

Gerta

Am 29.03.2022 um 23:36 schrieb Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (SP):