Skip to content

[R-meta] Meta analysis subgroups

6 messages · Julie Webbs, Michael Dewey, Wolfgang Viechtbauer

#
Hi Julie,

You have clarified the data structure, but I personally still have no idea what you mean by: "Now I want to run a met-analysis for X differences associated with Y." What exactly do you mean by that? What is your research question/hypothesis?

Best,
Wolfgang

-----Original Message-----
From: R-sig-meta-analysis [mailto:r-sig-meta-analysis-bounces at r-project.org] On Behalf Of Julie Webbs
Sent: Thursday, 29 August, 2019 17:00
To: Michael Dewey
Cc: r-sig-meta-analysis at r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R-meta] Meta analysis subgroups

Dear Michael

Thank you for your email. and sorry about that.

I have to variables, say X and Y.??

1. The X has two categories, let's say? a and b, so you? can calculate Mean and SD for group a and group b.?

2. The Y has two categories, let's say c and d. So you can calculate Man and SD for group a and group d.

I have run a meta-analysis separately for both X and Y using the meta package.?

Now I want to??run a met-analysis for? X differences associated with Y. Is it possible? or I need to consider other statistical procedures??

Here is the excel file

Thank you
Julie
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 1:28 PM Michael Dewey <lists at dewey.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
Dear Julie

Sorry bit that does not make much sense to me. See comments in-line
On 28/08/2019 21:42, Julie Webbs wrote:
If they are continuous then they do not have categories so I am at a 
loss here.
That also seems opaque here.
I am afraid your data-set did not arrive here well since you posted in 
HTML and such posts get mangled when they pass through the list. It 
might also help if you posted an example of what the differences you are 
seeking would look like.
#
Thank you,  Wolfgang

The research hypothesis is that the variable Y does not affect the variable
X. Or does the variable Y  affect the variable X?

Hope this clears things up.

Best Wishes,
Julie

On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 9:59 PM Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (SP) <
wolfgang.viechtbauer at maastrichtuniversity.nl> wrote:

            

  
  
#
Hi Julie,

If that is the hypothesis, then looking at the association between the SMD for X and the SMD for Y doesn't answer it. You should be looking at the association between X and Y within each study (and group) directly.

Best,
Wolfgang

-----Original Message-----
From: Julie Webbs [mailto:webbsjulie at gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, 05 September, 2019 9:14
To: Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (SP)
Cc: Michael Dewey; r-sig-meta-analysis at r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R-meta] Meta analysis subgroups

Thank you,? Wolfgang

The research hypothesis is that the variable Y does not affect the variable X. Or does the variable Y? affect the variable X??

Hope this clears things up.

Best Wishes,
Julie
On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 9:59 PM Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (SP) <wolfgang.viechtbauer at maastrichtuniversity.nl> wrote:
Hi Julie,

You have clarified the data structure, but I personally still have no idea what you mean by: "Now I want to run a met-analysis for X differences associated with Y." What exactly do you mean by that? What is your research question/hypothesis?

Best,
Wolfgang

-----Original Message-----
From: R-sig-meta-analysis [mailto:r-sig-meta-analysis-bounces at r-project.org] On Behalf Of Julie Webbs
Sent: Thursday, 29 August, 2019 17:00
To: Michael Dewey
Cc: r-sig-meta-analysis at r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R-meta] Meta analysis subgroups

Dear Michael

Thank you for your email. and sorry about that.

I have to variables, say X and Y.??

1. The X has two categories, let's say? a and b, so you? can calculate Mean and SD for group a and group b.?

2. The Y has two categories, let's say c and d. So you can calculate Man and SD for group a and group d.

I have run a meta-analysis separately for both X and Y using the meta package.?

Now I want to??run a met-analysis for? X differences associated with Y. Is it possible? or I need to consider other statistical procedures??

Here is the excel file

Thank you
Julie
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 1:28 PM Michael Dewey <lists at dewey.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
Dear Julie

Sorry bit that does not make much sense to me. See comments in-line
On 28/08/2019 21:42, Julie Webbs wrote:
If they are continuous then they do not have categories so I am at a 
loss here.
That also seems opaque here.
I am afraid your data-set did not arrive here well since you posted in 
HTML and such posts get mangled when they pass through the list. It 
might also help if you posted an example of what the differences you are 
seeking would look like.
#
Thank you,  Wolfgang

Would you help to do it? How I can do it using metafore?

Many thanks
Julie

On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 12:43 PM Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (SP) <
wolfgang.viechtbauer at maastrichtuniversity.nl> wrote:

            

  
  
#
Dear Julie

Unless the primary studies give you that information I think you are out 
of luck (or I completely misunderstand what you are trying to do).

Michael
On 05/09/2019 15:29, Julie Webbs wrote:

  
    
  
#
My point is that you need other information than what you have right now. You should be extracting measures that reflect the association between X and Y within studies (and groups), such as correlation coefficients.

Best,
Wolfgang

-----Original Message-----
From: Julie Webbs [mailto:webbsjulie at gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, 05 September, 2019 16:30
To: Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (SP)
Cc: r-sig-meta-analysis at r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R-meta] Meta analysis subgroups

Thank you,? Wolfgang

Would you help to do it? How I can do it using metafore?

Many thanks
Julie
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 12:43 PM Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (SP) <wolfgang.viechtbauer at maastrichtuniversity.nl> wrote:
Hi Julie,

If that is the hypothesis, then looking at the association between the SMD for X and the SMD for Y doesn't answer it. You should be looking at the association between X and Y within each study (and group) directly.

Best,
Wolfgang

-----Original Message-----
From: Julie Webbs [mailto:webbsjulie at gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, 05 September, 2019 9:14
To: Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (SP)
Cc: Michael Dewey; r-sig-meta-analysis at r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R-meta] Meta analysis subgroups

Thank you,? Wolfgang

The research hypothesis is that the variable Y does not affect the variable X. Or does the variable Y? affect the variable X??

Hope this clears things up.

Best Wishes,
Julie
On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 9:59 PM Viechtbauer, Wolfgang (SP) <wolfgang.viechtbauer at maastrichtuniversity.nl> wrote:
Hi Julie,

You have clarified the data structure, but I personally still have no idea what you mean by: "Now I want to run a met-analysis for X differences associated with Y." What exactly do you mean by that? What is your research question/hypothesis?

Best,
Wolfgang

-----Original Message-----
From: R-sig-meta-analysis [mailto:r-sig-meta-analysis-bounces at r-project.org] On Behalf Of Julie Webbs
Sent: Thursday, 29 August, 2019 17:00
To: Michael Dewey
Cc: r-sig-meta-analysis at r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R-meta] Meta analysis subgroups

Dear Michael

Thank you for your email. and sorry about that.

I have to variables, say X and Y.??

1. The X has two categories, let's say? a and b, so you? can calculate Mean and SD for group a and group b.?

2. The Y has two categories, let's say c and d. So you can calculate Man and SD for group a and group d.

I have run a meta-analysis separately for both X and Y using the meta package.?

Now I want to??run a met-analysis for? X differences associated with Y. Is it possible? or I need to consider other statistical procedures??

Here is the excel file

Thank you
Julie
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 1:28 PM Michael Dewey <lists at dewey.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
Dear Julie

Sorry bit that does not make much sense to me. See comments in-line
On 28/08/2019 21:42, Julie Webbs wrote:
If they are continuous then they do not have categories so I am at a 
loss here.
That also seems opaque here.
I am afraid your data-set did not arrive here well since you posted in 
HTML and such posts get mangled when they pass through the list. It 
might also help if you posted an example of what the differences you are 
seeking would look like.