Skip to content

[R-meta] Heterogeneity and moderated mediation

2 messages · Amy Zadow, Michael Dewey

Amy Zadow
# 
Hello,
I am seeking advice about my current results - any comments/criticism/advice around the heterogeneity statistics would be very helpful

[cid:image001.png at 01D82CC7.37F3D3B0]


Also I would be keen to conduct a moderated mediation but not sure where to start. Any advice/ recommended resources or code would be much appreciated.
Many thanks, Amy
_______________________________________________
R-sig-meta-analysis mailing list
R-sig-meta-analysis at r-project.org<mailto:R-sig-meta-analysis at r-project.org>
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-meta-analysis<https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-meta-analysis>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-meta-analysis/attachments/20220228/0eada006/attachment-0001.html>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 49109 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-meta-analysis/attachments/20220228/0eada006/attachment-0001.png>
Michael Dewey
# 
It is hard to comment in detail as we do not have any information about 
the meta-analysis you ran. Are there two separate analyses, one for 
groups and one for individuals, two separate data-sets, one for groups 
and one for individuals, or one analysis using a multi-level 
meta-analysis? Presumably that is all replicated four times for each PSC 
(whatever that is) but that could equally be another level in the 
multi-level mode.

Would the nature of the research environment and study design have 
caused you to believe that heterogeneity was expected or unlikely?

Michael
On 28/02/2022 06:50, Amy Zadow wrote: