Dear all, while conducting a meta-analysis I asked myself a few questions. a)When I'm conduction a random effects meta-analysis with correlation-coefficients as effects sizes using rma(measure = "COR", ri = corr, ni = n, data = data) , does R conduct the analysis with Fisher's-z-transformed coefficients in the background and compute the main-effect results back into the r metric for the output or not? b) Or should I use rma(measure="ZCOR", ri = corr, ni = n, data = data), and conduct the main result back by myown at the end? In the second version the Trim and Fill method doesn't make any sense. I would be glad about some support. Sincerely, Maria
[R-meta] Question about rma(measure = "COR", ..)
3 messages · Jalynskij, Maria, Michael Dewey, Guido Schwarzer
Dear Maria If you want it to analyse on the transformed scale you need your second option ZCOR and then back transform the results. You may want to use the function transf.ztor() provided to help you. I am not sure about your query about trim and fill here but it does seem to have become a less popular option recently. Michael
On 21/10/2019 14:22, Jalynskij, Maria wrote:
Dear all, while conducting a meta-analysis I asked myself a few questions. a)When I'm conduction a random effects meta-analysis with correlation-coefficients as effects sizes using rma(measure = "COR", ri = corr, ni = n, data = data) , does R conduct the analysis with Fisher's-z-transformed coefficients in the background and compute the main-effect results back into the r metric for the output or not? b) Or should I use rma(measure="ZCOR", ri = corr, ni = n, data = data), and conduct the main result back by myown at the end? In the second version the Trim and Fill method doesn't make any sense. I would be glad about some support. Sincerely, Maria [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
_______________________________________________ R-sig-meta-analysis mailing list R-sig-meta-analysis at r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-meta-analysis
Am 21.10.19 um 15:22 schrieb Jalynskij, Maria:
[...] b) Or should I use rma(measure="ZCOR", ri = corr, ni = n, data = data), and conduct the main result back by myown at the end? In the second version the Trim and Fill method doesn't make any sense.
Dear Maria, While one may question whether Trim and Fill is the best method to adjust for small study effects in meta-analysis, I do not understand why the method should make sense for untransformed correlations but not for Fisher z-transformed correlations. Trim and Fill removes the most extreme studies (trim step), determines a symmetry axis and adds the extreme studies on the opposite side (fill step). This works both for untransformed and Fisher transformed correlations. Best wishes, Guido P.S. I would always prefer to meta-analyse Fisher transformed correlations as the meta-analysis of untransformed correlations could result in impossible confidence limits outside -1 and 1. Accordingly, the Fisher method is the default in /metacor()/ of R package *meta* (which automatically does the back-calculation for the user).
Dr. Guido Schwarzer Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center - University of Freiburg Postal address: Stefan-Meier-Str. 26, D-79104 Freiburg Phone: +49/761/203-6668 Mail: sc at imbi.uni-freiburg.de Homepage: http://www.imbi.uni-freiburg.de ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6214-9087 R-book: https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319214153 [[alternative HTML version deleted]]