Skip to content

[R-meta] Fwd: About the coefficient in meta-regression analysis

2 messages · 英文科陳品誠, Michael Dewey

#
Dear Michael and all,

       Thank you for the swift response. I do have some further questions
to ask.
       (a) So, in order to "remove" the intercept, what code should I use?
       (b) Let's say my research is about whether using digital games will
affect the result of English vocabulary acquisition or not. So as you said,
"... remove the intercept so each coefficient would then be tested for its
difference from zero." , does that mean if I rerun the code again with the
removal of intercept and presumably get an estimate of 0.3 from the
subgroup "eduH" and the p-value is less than 0.05. Can I say that "eduH has
a positive coefficient to English vocabulary acquisition"? If not, what
would the coefficient mean here (since there is no intercept to compare to)?

     Thanks again for your kindly help!
    Nick
??? (Nick Chen)
Email: t571 at wlgsh.tp.edu.tw <t5741 at wlgsh.tp.edu.tw>


Michael Dewey <lists at dewey.myzen.co.uk> ? 2023?12?19? ?? ??9:14???

  
  
#
Dear Nick

Comments in-line
On 19/12/2023 14:31, ?????? via R-sig-meta-analysis wrote:
I do not use the same package as you but where you currently have educ 
as the moderator try putting educ - 1
It is comparing the estimated effect size with zero. Whether that is a 
meaningful scientific question is up to you. I would be surprised if the 
coefficient did turn out to be 0.3 but try it and see. Note that the 
overall test for the effect of educ will be testing a different 
hypothesis when you remove the intercept.

Michael