Why se.fit differ in predict.glm and predict.glmmadmb?

Ben Bolker <bbolker at ...> writes:

Xandre <alex <at> ...> writes:


  It looks like glmmADMB is getting the estimate of the correlation
between the fixed effects wrong (I don't yet know whether this is 
a problem with
the optimization in AD Model Builder or an actual bug in the translation
of results from ADMB output to R):

Update: it turns out that you found a serious, long-standing
bug in glmmADMB.  I've just moved glmmADMB development to

https://github.com/bbolker/glmmadmb

so I'm hoping you can simply install the new version via

devtools::install_github("bbolker/glmmadmb")

and see if that solves the problem

 cheers
    Ben Bolker