variable-and person-centered approaches and multilevel models
Following up on an unanswered (I think) old post: I had not heard the term "person-centred approach" before, but after searching a bit, it seems to refer to focus on clustering under a specific grouping term instead of a specific co-variate. I think this distinction is somewhat blurred in mixed-effects models. While the fixed effects are more or less what is called "variable centered" (indeed, the canonical examples in the psych literature are things like linear regression and ANOVA), the random effects allow for variation to follow the grouping variables, which is more like (although maybe not exactly the same) as the "person-centred" approach. The covariance matrix / the correlations between random effects is more difficult to comprehend, but is actually the part that perhaps best captures "person centering", as it shows the relationship between the by-person regression slopes. As a side note, I'm not sure it makes sense to include the personal mean as a separate covariate, as depending on the exact structure of your data, it may already be captured in random intercept by participant. Phillip
On 12/05/2016 11:20 AM, Elisabeth Schubach wrote:
Dear all,
I am currently trying to figure out which parts of a multilevel model are
person-centered and which ones are variable-centered.
I have a three-level structure, with assessment points (Level 1) nested
in relationships (Level 2) nested in individuals (Level 3). And I model
closeness to relationship partner r of individual i at time t as a function
of PERSSONALITY-withinti
(i.e., a time-varying covariate that was centered within individuals,
representing within-person deviations from an
individual's own mean level across time. To account for between-person
differences in the
respective PERSONALITY trait, I included personal mean (i.e., mean across
time points for
each specific individual, centered on the grand mean) as a time-invariant
covariate. I now wonder whether the within part is person-centered and
whether the between-part is variable-centered or whether
the parameters ?0 and ?1 are variable-centered (because they represent
average associations) and the parameters b0i, b0ri, b1ri are person-centered
(because they are specific for each individual).
I would be very happy if you can tell me which specific parts in mlm are
person-centered and which ones variable-centered.
Best,
Elisabeth
CLOSENESS tri = (?0 + b0i + b0ri)
+ ?1 (TIMEtri)
+ (?1 + b1ri) (PERSONALITY-withinti)
+ ?2 (PERSONALITY-betweeni)
+?tri
with i = individual i
r = relationship partner r
t = time t
_______________________________________________ R-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models