A consultation about DF of the result of lmer
It's very hard to say without more information (try e.g. here <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5963269/how-to-make-a-great-r-reproducible-example> or look at other posts in the list archive <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-mixed-models/> A first guess is that you have a fixed-effect predictor that's supposed to be a factor with 6 levels, but is actually being interpreted as a numeric variable. If that's the case, then either changing it within the data set mydata$pred1 <- factor(mydata$pred1) or doing it on the fly in your model lmer(response ~ factor(pred1) + ...) should fix the problem.
On 2019-05-05 9:11 p.m., ??? wrote:
Dear, I am a graduated student who's topic is ecology. Recently, I am studying how to establish a liner mixed model to exclude the error caused by the difference of site by using lme4 in R. I found when I calculated p value by using the function of "Anova" of car package the Df is 1. But in fact the data set has 6 levels. Then I also operate according to the code of reference PDF of lme4 in P52(lmer) without any change. When run "anova(fm1, fm2)" I found the Df of fm1 also is 1. As I see if the Df is wrong the p value would be wrong either. I want to know how to correct my wrong. I will very appreciate your reply. Best regards, Rumeng He [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
_______________________________________________ R-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models