Development version of lme4 now passes its tests
Douglas Bates wrote:
You're correct, Bernd, that the versions available by install.packages from the repository at R-forge.R-packages.org appear to be out of date. Even the tar.gz file scm-latest.tar.gz is out of date (apparently from January 04). Those who can build a package from the source files can obtain the latest version from the SVN archive at R-forge (instructions are given at the SCM tab on the main project page). I have just submitted the package to Uwe's win-builder.R-project.org site to create a binary Windows package, which I will make available on my web site as http://www.stat.wisc.edu/~bates/lme4-2008-01-06-wiin32.zip Stefan: Will someone be able to check on what is happening to the nightly builds?
this is fixed. the permissions were wrong in the svn export directory. This was because of some experimenting a few days ago. the latest binaries are now available as usual. I'm sorry for the inconvenience caused. Best, Stefan
On Jan 7, 2008 8:18 AM, Bernd Weiss <bernd.weiss at uni-koeln.de> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Douglas Bates schrieb: [...] | I have added web pages documenting the C source code at | http://lme4.R-forge.R-project.org/doxygen. In general you can use | http://lme4.R-forge.R-project.org/ as the 'home page' for the project. | There is a link there to the project summary page. You can browse | the source code for the package under the SCM (source code management) | tab on the project summary page. The SCM tab provides information on | how you can access the svn repository. Alternatively, you can wait | for the package builds to occur overnight (in Vienna) and install the | new version with | | install.packages("lme4", repos = "http://r-forge.r-project.org") I am sorry if I am missing anything but I was unable to download the windows version of the development version of lme4. Neither <install.packages("lme4", repos ...> nor the SCM approach ("win32-latest.zip") works properly. Some of my datasets are very strange... with respect to multilevel modelling, of course (N ~ 80.000, K = 15, binary dependent variable). So, it would be interesting to (1) replicate former results. In addition, (2) I would like to compare lmer results with MLWwiN and Stata (xtlogit, gllamm, xtmelogit). Regards, Bernd -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHgjSiUsbvfbd00+ERAsrwAJ4kxHLdn7i39V8Edo40zfIAoweyYQCcDb/m v95Gz8Rw4RKLM3q4pnDtwmc= =MX4w -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________ R-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models