Message-ID: <90B8EF26-2715-469D-B3CB-6CCC25D17130@auckland.ac.nz>
Date: 2009-05-21T21:17:55Z
From: Rolf Turner
Subject: New to LMER with 2 (easy?) questions...
In-Reply-To: <bfd10a120905211414w2fc5ab11occ6a3b8f897e12a1@mail.gmail.com>
On 22/05/2009, at 9:14 AM, Hank Stevens wrote:
> HI Rolf,
> The BLOCK numbers should reflect their "true" underlying nature.
> These data would suggest that Site and Block are crossed because e.g.
> BLOCK 1 exists at two sites:
> SITE BLOCK
> 1 1
> 1 2
> 1 3
> 2 1
> 2 2
> 2 3
>
> These data would suggest that Blocks are unique (and therefore
> necessarily nested within Sites):
> SITE BLOCK
> 1 1
> 1 2
> 1 3
> 2 4
> 2 5
> 2 6
That's what I thought. But it's the opposite of what Ben Bolker said.
Unless, of course, I'm totally confused.
cheers,
Rolf
######################################################################
Attention:\ This e-mail message is privileged and confid...{{dropped:9}}