Skip to content
Prev 5171 / 20628 Next

overdispersion estimation in a binomial GLMM

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 01/21/2011 11:11 AM, Thomas Merkling wrote:
Perhaps not. (How many observations?)
That is a 'message' (not even a 'warning'), rather than an error.
Doug Bates was initially quite suspicious of this approach (adding a
random effect for every observation), which makes little sense in the
LMM case (where it would be confounded with the residual error).  Maybe
I will prevail upon him to see if we can drop the message since it makes
people worry unnecessarily ...

  If you wanted a crude test, you could compare the log-likelihoods of
your model with and without the overdispersion term (via anova()).  The
p-value of the likelihood ratio test computed in this way is
approximately double what it should be (because the null value of the
variance parameter (zero) is on the boundary of its feasible space) but
it should give you an approximate idea ...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk05ssgACgkQc5UpGjwzenOCmwCfVrZKwsUUxx7uBnsbrfWIY1iP
IYsAnREK+mzr57oNzdT/gW+u0dyrJIRZ
=NkyO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----