Skip to content
Prev 18159 / 20628 Next
Original Raw

model check for negative binomial model

Ben Bolker 
Short answer: if emergence success gets much above 50%, then the
approximation you're making (Poisson + offset for binomial, or NB +
offset for negative binomial) doesn't work well.  You might try a
beta-binomial (with glmmTMB) or a binomial + an observation-level random
effect.

  (On the other hand, your intercept is -0.3, which corresponds to a
baseline emergence of 0.42 - not *very* high (but some beaches and years
will be well above that ...)

  Beyond that, are there any obvious patterns of mis-fit in the
predicted values ... ?
On 2020-02-11 8:09 p.m., Alessandra Bielli wrote:

Thread (7 messages)

Alessandra Bielli model check for negative binomial model Feb 11 Ben Bolker model check for negative binomial model Feb 11 Alessandra Bielli model check for negative binomial model Feb 12 Thierry Onkelinx model check for negative binomial model Feb 17 Alessandra Bielli model check for negative binomial model Feb 17 Ben Bolker model check for negative binomial model Feb 17 Alessandra Bielli model check for negative binomial model Feb 17