Effect Size in lme
Dear Ben, Many thanks. Thanks for clarifying: yes, I am interested in effect size with respect to biological significance of my findings. In addition to the suggestions you have provided, which I hope to talk to you some, would you recommend using the following formula, from Nakagawa & Cuthill (2007) Biol. Rev. 82, 591-605: partial correlation coefficient, r = the t value divided by the square of the sum of the t value squared and its corresponding degrees of freedom? Here is the equation: I am not quite sure how to interpret, with respect to the kind of effect I am looking for, the parameter estimates and the other values that you suggested. Are there resources you can recommend. In the meantime, I will check in P & B 2000 as well as in West et al. 2007. Thanks, Patrick
On Mar 8, 2010, at 4:39 PM, Ben Bolker wrote:
Patrick Onyango wrote:
All, I have been asked to provide effect sizes for results I obtained from lme. Does anyone know how to handle this? Many thanks already. Patrick
There are a lot of definitions of "effect size". If the request is simply to indicate the practical relevance of the effects (i.e. 'biological' significance), I would just quote the parameter estimates (with standard errors), and the standard deviations of the random effects ... -- Ben Bolker Associate professor, Biology Dep't, Univ. of Florida bolker at ufl.edu / people.biology.ufl.edu/bolker GPG key: people.biology.ufl.edu/bolker/benbolker-publickey.asc