Skip to content
Prev 13977 / 20628 Next

glmmADMB

Dear Veronique,

This is helpful. It looks like the small number of villages is the problem.
If the animals stay within one village you could try if explicitly nesting
them helps (1|village/animal) instead of (1|village) + (1|animal). It's a
wild guess and I don't expect it to work. A crossed random effect like
(1|village) + (1|animal) with unique id's for each animal is an implicit
nested random effect. Hence (1|village/animal) should be the same model as
(1|village) + (1|animal). But if it does work, please let us know.

Other options:
- try to supply starting values
- add village to the fixed effects
- simply removing village from the model
- look for a Bayesian solution (e.g. INLA)

Best regards,

ir. Thierry Onkelinx
Instituut voor natuur- en bosonderzoek / Research Institute for Nature and
Forest
team Biometrie & Kwaliteitszorg / team Biometrics & Quality Assurance
Kliniekstraat 25
1070 Anderlecht
Belgium

To call in the statistician after the experiment is done may be no more
than asking him to perform a post-mortem examination: he may be able to say
what the experiment died of. ~ Sir Ronald Aylmer Fisher
The plural of anecdote is not data. ~ Roger Brinner
The combination of some data and an aching desire for an answer does not
ensure that a reasonable answer can be extracted from a given body of data.
~ John Tukey

2015-11-17 10:51 GMT+01:00 Veronique Dermauw <vdermauw at itg.be>: