-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: R-sig-mixed-models [mailto:r-sig-mixed-models-bounces at r-
project.org] Namens Nynke l
Verzonden: vrijdag 13 oktober 2017 21:50
Aan: r-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org
Onderwerp: [R-sig-ME] Model within subjects treatment variable and
multiple measurements per treatment: is this the correct model?
Hello all,
I have a question regarding my analysis and how to correctly model this in r
syntax.
I have a dataset from an experiment in which each subject received 3
treatments (HealthPrime, HedPrime and NonfPrime; within subjects factor).
In each of these treatments, 40 measurements have been done of my DV
(choice_topbottom, contineous variable) and two other predictor variables
(tastiness_dif_topminbottom and healthiness_dif_topminbottom). In
addition, I have a subject level variable (DEBQ_restraint) for which I would
like to know if there is an interaction with treatment or the predictor
variables.
What I basically want to know is if there is a difference between the
treatments in how tastiness_dif_topminbottom and
healthiness_dif_topminbottom relate to choice_topbottom. And I would like
to know whether this is influenced by DEBQ_restraint.
Is the model below correct to take into account the fact that the treatment is
a within subjects factor and that there are multiple measurements per
treatment?
fit <- lmer(choice_topbottom ~ tastiness_dif_topminbottom +
healthiness_dif_topminbottom + HealthPrime*tastiness_dif_topminbottom
+ HedPrime*healthiness_dif_topminbottom +
HedPrime*tastiness_dif_topminbottom +
HealthPrime*healthiness_dif_topminbottom + (1 | pp_code) +
DEBQ_restraint + tastiness_dif_topminbottom*DEBQ_restraint +
healthiness_dif_topminbottom*DEBQ_restraint +
HealthPrime*tastiness_dif_topminbottom*DEBQ_restraint +
HedPrime*healthiness_dif_topminbottom*DEBQ_restraint +
HedPrime*tastiness_dif_topminbottom*DEBQ_restraint +
HealthPrime*healthiness_dif_topminbottom*DEBQ_restraint, data = data)
I hope someone with more experience in these kind of models can let me
know whether this is correct.
Many thanks in advance!
Best,
Nynke
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]