Is BLUP a good thing?
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Dominick Samperi wrote:
After reading the recent publications on the dangers of applying BLUP to natural populations (Hadfield et al 2010, Morrissey et al 2010) I was left wondering why it works at all. The latter paper claims that BLUP has a long and successful history when applied to animal breeding, but no examples showing its effectiveness were presented.
It depends on how much additional information your model for the latent variables carries. In the genetic case, you have a strong biological model for the genetic covariances between individuals given the relationships, and in the animal breeding case, lots of data (eg milk production in hundreds of offspring of a single prize bull). Other usages are to give shrunken estimators in an empirical Bayes way, but for frequentists ;), or disattenuation of measurement error, or estimation of factor scores (they may not actually be called BLUPs in other fields).