Cumulative link mixed model appropriate in a 2x4 design?
Hi, With normal response, you are right in thinking that you don't need a cumulative link mixed model. A linear mixed model (with group as a random term?) should suffice. Cheers, Jarrod Quoting Klemens Weigl <klemens.weigl at gmail.com> on Wed, 12 Sep 2012 15:58:44 +0200:
Dear R-sig-mixed-model-group! Basically I've got a fairly simple dataset with a 2x4 design (two independent variables = i.v.) and a continuous response variable (only one dependent variable). 1st i.v.: two different treatments 2nd i.v.: 4 time points: after 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks --> at each time point: mice with tumor cells are killed and the tumor growth was analyzed. Therefore no repeated measures. Every mouse can be just in one of the two treatment groups in just one of the 4 time points. The data are normally distributed, but with unequal and small 'n' in each group (ranging from 8 to 14 mice per group). Objective: to test wether or not one treatment is better than the other treatment over the 4 time points all together? Someone was suggesting "cumulative link mixed model with Laplace approximation" for this task. Well I am wondering if the clmm with Laplace approximation is appropriate for this task, because the response variable is "continuous" and not ordinal (as written in the clmm2_tutorial) Am I loosing much power if I apply it? I'd be interested if someone might have some arguments for or against the application of clmm with L.a. in that design-setting - or a better solution? Kind regards, Klemens [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
_______________________________________________ R-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336.