taking in account results of a gmml in despite of error warning about memory?
Hi Glenda, Try the following with a fresh session of R to maximise memory: memory.limit(size=4095) # report memory limit memory.limit(size=NA) # maximum amount of memory obtained from the OS is reported memory.limit(size=TRUE) # amount currently in use memory.limit(size=FALSE) When u clean your workspace using rm(), u may need to run gc() to free up space. Also to double check its size, and not something else try running it on a subset of the data. Although as U have random effects U'll need to insure the subset has the right data that the random component makes sense. It may also be due to U estimating a huge covariance matrix, think about how big it would be. Chris Howden B.Sc. (Hons) GStat. Founding Partner Evidence Based Strategic Development, IP Commercialisation and Innovation, Data Analysis, Modelling and Training (mobile) 0410 689 945 (fax) +612 4782 9023 chris at trickysolutions.com.au Disclaimer: The information in this email and any attachments to it are confidential and may contain legally privileged information.?If you are not the named or intended recipient, please delete this communication and contact us immediately.?Please note you are not authorised to copy, use or disclose this communication or any attachments without our consent. Although this email has been checked by anti-virus software, there is a risk that email messages may be corrupted or infected by viruses or other interferences. No responsibility is accepted for such interference. Unless expressly stated, the views of the writer are not those of the company. Tricky Solutions always does our best to provide accurate forecasts and analyses based on the data supplied, however it is possible that some important predictors were not included in the data sent to us. Information provided by us should not be solely relied upon when making decisions and clients should use their own judgement. -----Original Message----- From: r-sig-mixed-models-bounces at r-project.org [mailto:r-sig-mixed-models-bounces at r-project.org] On Behalf Of glenda mendieta Sent: Tuesday, 29 November 2011 2:18 AM To: r-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org Subject: [R-sig-ME] taking in account results of a gmml in despite of error warning about memory? Hi to everyone, I have being trying to fit aglmm on binay and poisson data and when I run this model, with poisson data, the error below shows up. But still gives me results. Does this means that those are only partial results and shouldn't be taking into account, because the model didn't run fully?
glmmab.FMv<-glmer(abundance~c.census*avail.surface*abundance.prev
+(0+spp|tree), data=db.e_St, family=poisson(link=log)) Error: cannot allocate vector of size 183 Kb In addition:Warning messages: 1: In structure(list(message = as.character(message), call = call), : Reached total allocation of 4061Mb: see help(memory.size) 2: In structure(list(message = as.character(message), call = call), : Reached total allocation of 4061Mb: see help(memory.size) I am using the latest version of R and R studio. As I have seen before that some complicated models don't run at all if I had already many other models as objects in the workspace, I did run this one with the minimum use of memory (just the database as an object). I also read that R is suppose to do not have memory problems any more, but I don't really know how to expand the use of memory by R on my pc. For what I observed with mem.limits() it appears unlimited (NA), but then if I type mem.limit(), 4061 shows up. Does that mean that I can not run those models in my pc at al?. Here, some more info in the data: Number of obs: 23407, groups:tree,89 Thanks to anyone who can shed some light on this, Glenda Mendieta-Leiva PhD candidate University of Oldenburg
On 28/11/2011 12:00, r-sig-mixed-models-request at r-project.org wrote:
Send R-sig-mixed-models mailing list submissions to r-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to r-sig-mixed-models-request at r-project.org You can reach the person managing the list at r-sig-mixed-models-owner at r-project.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of R-sig-mixed-models digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Population fit with glm works fine: totally off with glmer (Dieter Menne) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 08:21:44 +0000 (UTC) From: Dieter Menne<dieter.menne at menne-biomed.de> To: r-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org Subject: [R-sig-ME] Population fit with glm works fine: totally off with glmer Message-ID:<loom.20111128T091939-576 at post.gmane.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Ben Bolker<bbolker at ...> writes: This (using the aforementioned Dorie package) library(blme) (fitbglmer<- summary(g3<- bglmer(Satiated~MealVol*Group+(1|Subject), family=binomial, data=sdata))) ## requires LATEST version of coefplot2 from r-forge: ## packages won't be rebuilt until tomorrow, probably library(coefplot2) coefplot2(list(gf1,gf2,gf3),col=c(1,2,4)) coefplot2(list(gf1,gf2,gf3),xlim=c(-0.05,0.15)) Thanks, Ben, I had already started with MCMCglmm, but did not know about
blme.
Dieter ------------------------------
_______________________________________________ R-sig-mixed-models mailing list R-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models End of R-sig-mixed-models Digest, Vol 59, Issue 39 **************************************************
_______________________________________________ R-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models