Dear Mark,
In case of a linear model you can create a new variable Y = R - ssb and
model Y without offset instead of R with ssb as offset. That should give
the same parameter estimates.
Best regards,
ir. Thierry Onkelinx
Instituut voor natuur- en bosonderzoek / Research Institute for Nature and
Forest
team Biometrie & Kwaliteitszorg / team Biometrics & Quality Assurance
Kliniekstraat 25
1070 Anderlecht
Belgium
+ 32 2 525 02 51
+ 32 54 43 61 85
Thierry.Onkelinx at inbo.be
www.inbo.be
To call in the statistician after the experiment is done may be no more
than asking him to perform a post-mortem examination: he may be able to say
what the experiment died of.
~ Sir Ronald Aylmer Fisher
The plural of anecdote is not data.
~ Roger Brinner
The combination of some data and an aching desire for an answer does not
ensure that a reasonable answer can be extracted from a given body of data.
~ John Tukey
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: r-sig-mixed-models-bounces at r-project.org [mailto:r-sig-mixed-models-
bounces at r-project.org] Namens Mark Payne
Verzonden: dinsdag 11 november 2014 13:23
Aan: r-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org
Onderwerp: [R-sig-ME] Offset() in gls() in nlme
Hi,
I am trying to use the following model formula in gls() in the nlme
package:
R ~ Turb + offset(ssb)
Unfortunately, gls() seems to ignore the offset argument and give results
that are identical to
R ~ Turb
This is not the case when I use lm() - however, I would like to include a
corAR1() term as well, which is why I am using gls().
Is this known and intended behaviour? If so, is there a recommended
workaround/alternative?
Best wishes,
Mark
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]