Hi,
I am well aware of the reasons why P values don't exist, but that wasn't my
question. My question, and maybe I should have provided clarification in
my first inquiry, was I notice papers publishing p values and F statistics
for fixed effects, including the intercept. I am using lmerTest to get F
statistics and P values for all fixed effects except for the intercept. If
said papers do not mention how they are getting a P value for the
intercept, how do you think they are getting it?
Jacob
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Doran, Harold <HDoran at air.org> wrote:
Jacob
In terms of (1), see the ?ranef help and specifically the postVar
argument. That will return the conditional variances which you can use for
the Cis you desire.
In terms of (2), this is a longstanding issue with mixed models and has
been well-discussed on this list for years. See the link below for a
description/rationale for why p-values, etc do not appear.
The main issue is that it is unknown what distribution that statistics
actually follow.
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2006-May/094765.html
On 9/13/13 2:11 PM, "AvianResearchDivision" <segerfan83 at gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,
I have a couple of seemingly basic questions about the lmer output. I am
running a model with random slopes and intercepts, along with a couple of
fixed effects. I am using lmerTest to obtain F statistics and P values as
well. My questions are:
1. How do I obtain 95% CI for the random effects?
2. If I use anova(model, ddf="Kenward-Roger"), I get F statistics and P
values for my fixed effects, however, it never gives me a F statistic or
degrees of freedom for the intercept. How can I obtain this?
Thank you for your help ahead of time.
Jacob
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]