Define prior in MCMCglmm

And this should be indicated in MCMCglmm() as random =  
~us(1):subj_ID + us(fin_B):subj_ID.

Dear Szymek,
thank you very much for your answer.

Yes, the random effects were indicated wrongly in MCMCglmm! My  
intention is of course to look at variance associated with subjects  
(subj_ID).
I meant (1 + fin_B|subj_ID), as indicated in glmer() (lme4 package).
And this should be indicated in MCMCglmm() as random =  
~us(1):subj_ID + us(fin_B):subj_ID.
Please, correct me if I am wrong.

So the model runs with:
k <- length(levels(fallmid$resp_X))
I <- diag(k-1)
J <- matrix(rep(1, (k-1)^2), c(k-1, k-1))
prior <- list(R = list(fix = 1, V = 0.5 * (I+J), n = 2),
                 G = list(G1 = list(V = diag(1), n = 2), G2 = list(V  
= diag(2), n = 2)))

fallmid.MCMCglmm <- MCMCglmm(resp_X ~ lang * ini_pch + lang * manner  
+ lang * fin_B,
                             random = ~us(1):subj_ID + us(fin_B):subj_ID,
                             family="categorical", data=fallmid,
                             prior=prior
                             )

In your suggestion you indicate nu=2.002. What does "nu" mean? What  
is the difference between nu and n? In the MCMCglmm manual and in  
the tutorial they are both defined as "degrees of belief". What does  
this mean?

Kind regards,
Maria Paola







Zitat von Szymek Drobniak <geralttee at gmail.com>:

Dear Maria,

I'm not sure what exactly you're trying to test with your model, but to
start with - your prior specification assumes 2 random effects, and your
model has only one (a structured covariance matrix with fin_B defined as a
random effect). This specification you've provided is similar to a random
intercept/slope model - but I can't see why you would like to fit it (most
importantly, you assumed that fin_B is both a fixed and random effect). If
your intention was to look at variance associated with subjects (subj_ID),
and you'd like to see if this variance is heterogeneous for different
levels of fin_B - you could fit:

MCMCglmm(your_fixed_formula_here, random=~us(fin_B):subj_ID, ...)

and the prior would be (assuming fin_B has 2 levels as you've said)

list(R=list(V=1, fix=1), G=list(G1=list(V=diag(2),nu=2.002)))

that's for start, then have a look at mcmc-series plots to see if it mixes
well and tweak your model further if necessary.

Cheer
szymek

-- 
Dr. Maria Paola Bissiri

TU Dresden
Fakult?t Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik
Institut f?r Akustik und Sprachkommunikation
01062 Dresden

Barkhausen-Bau, Raum S54
Helmholtzstra?e 18

Tel: +49 (0)351 463-34283
Fax: +49 (0)351 463-37781
E-Mail: Maria_Paola.Bissiri at tu-dresden.de
http://wwwpub.zih.tu-dresden.de/~bissiri/index.htm