Skip to content
Prev 11723 / 20628 Next

[Lme4-authors] Underdispersion in GLMM

[I'm taking the liberty of forwarding this to r-sig-mixed-models,
where I think it is more appropriate.]

  A few thoughts about underdispersion:

 * underdispersed _count_ data (e.g. litter sizes for large mammals) are
often better captured by an ordinal model (e.g. ordinal::clmm)
 * you _might_ be able to fit underdispersed binomial data by allowing
negative correlation structure within groups: this could be tricky,
though, depending on the size and complexity of your data set.  (The
standard approach of nested random effects is essentially a compound
symmetry structure, but only allows positive/non-negative correlations.
 The nlme package enabled fitting models with a more general CS
structure, but that's not implemented in lme4, and slightly harder to do
in GLMMs in general).
 * the standard 'quasi-likelihood' approach, i.e. taking the estimated
level of underdispersion and shrinking all the confidence intervals
accordingly, might be a reasonable first/hackish approach.  The thing to
be careful about there is that I have yet to read any good treatment (or
figure out for myself) how quasi-likelihood estimates of 'residual'
variance interact with the estimates of the random effects variances ...

  good luck,
  Ben Bolker
On 14-03-31 03:51 PM, Eva Reindl wrote: