Skip to content
Prev 7267 / 20628 Next

question regarding summary output with three-way interactions

Hi again,

you're right. usually when terms are missing in our output - it means
the're not identifiable from our data (e.g. there's not enough
replication or specific combinations of factors are missing) - that's
why your'e getting some interactions tested after removing some other
terms. As for which terms to include - my conservative way of doing
things is to include lower terms always when I want to have higher
terms. What happens when you remove the triple interactions? Also I
wouldn;t say that interpretation of continous:categorical interactions
?should be avoided in cases similar to yours: such interactions
quantify differences in betas at respective levels of the categorical
variable and provide useful valuable insight to how your response
changes with the covariate. What however should be avoided (or better
said - applied with caution) is drawing conclusions about categorical
variables (i.e. A or B in your model) if the're involved in
significant interactions with continous variables (problem similar to
heterogenous slopes in classical ANCOVA).

Cheers,
sz.

On 6 January 2012 20:40, Stefanie Kuchinsky
<stefanie.kuchinsky at gmail.com> wrote:
--
Szymon Drobniak || Population Ecology Group
Institute of Environmental Sciences,?Jagiellonian University
ul. Gronostajowa 7, 30-387 Krak?w, POLAND
tel.: +48 12 664 51 79 fax: +48 12 664 69 12

www.eko.uj.edu.pl/drobniak