Lmer and variance-covariance matrix
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Rolf Turner <r.turner at auckland.ac.nz> wrote:
On 12/03/11 02:56, Jarrod Hadfield wrote:
Hi, In addition, each trait is only measured once for each id (correct?) which means that the likelihood could not be optimised even if the data-set was massive. If you could fix the residual variance to some value (preferably zero) then the problem has a unique solution given enough data, but I'm not sure this can be done in lmer?.
<SNIP> I think that it ***CANNOT*** be done. ?I once asked Doug about the possibility of this, and he ignored me. ?As people so often do. :-) Especially when I ask silly questions .....
Did Doug really ignore you or did he say that the methods in lmer are based on determining the solution to a penalized linear least squares problem so they can't be applied to a model that has zero residual variance. Also the basic parameterization for the variance-covariance matrix of the random effects is in terms of the relative standard deviation (\sigma_1/\sigma) which is problematic when \sigma is zero. (My apologies if I did ignore you, Rolf. I get a lot of email and sometimes such requests slip down the stack and then get lost. I'm very good at procrastinating about the answers to such questions.)