fitting models with poisson distributed data
Thanks, Ken. I am coming to a similar conclusion. My data is very zero inflated and I have considered using negative binomial, which also does not seem to work with lmer. I will try working on both quasipoisson and a binomial version of my data. Thanks, -Page
Ken Beath wrote:
On 25/10/2008, at 9:37 AM, Page E. Van Meter wrote:
Hi, Now that I have the code figured out, I hoping for some help on defining my model. I might be guilty of trying to fit an overly complex model to my data, although my model seems very simple in comparison to what has been discussed here. I'm hoping for feedback on my model design. Thanks in advance! I have some pretty ugly longitudinal data measuring hormones and behaviors from individual hyenas over many years (355 samples from 39 individuals). We collect hormone samples based on opportunity and have several samples from each individual (3-9 samples per hyena). My ultimate goal is to see if my hormone data explains any of the variation we see in the behavior data (aggression, I'll call it aggs). My dependent measurement is a behavior rate, count of aggs over time just prior to hormone sample collection. It is very zero heavy (lots of individuals did not aggress prior to hormone sample donation) and resistant to transformation to normality, but seems to be a pretty poisson distribution. My predictors are hormones and reproductive state (pregnant or lactating, which effect both aggression and hormones).
From the output the estimated scale (I don't see this in the version of lmer I'm using?) is 7.7 so data is definitely not Poisson. Assuming Poisson will give incorrect p values. Seeing the quasi Poisson doesn't seem to work properly I'm not certain what is a good choice. I haven't tried it but maybe quasi Poisson works in one of the GEE packages. It may be Ok to limit the analysis to no aggression/aggression allowing fitting as binomial data. Ken
m2<-lmer(aggs~reprostate+hrm1+hrm2+(1|id), family=poisson, aggs)
Generalized linear mixed model fit using Laplace
Formula: aggs ~ reprostate + hrm1 + hrm2 + (1 | id)
Data: aggs
Family: poisson(log link)
AIC BIC logLik deviance
12369 12387 -6179 12359
Random effects:
Groups Name Variance Std.Dev.
id (Intercept) 4.9353 2.2216 number of obs: 307, groups: id, 39
Estimated scale (compare to 1 ) 7.682887
Fixed effects:
Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|) (Intercept)
-3.07625 0.39575 -7.773 7.65e-15 ***
reprostate 2.32056 0.07724 30.044 < 2e-16 ***
hrm1 0.12575 0.04020 3.128 0.00176 **
hrm2 -0.80434 0.04770 -16.862 < 2e-16 ***
---
Correlation of Fixed Effects:
(Intr) statct ecent
statecat -0.381 ecent -0.085 0.271 acent
0.136 -0.339 -0.079
--
************************************
Page E. Van Meter
Michigan State University
Department of Zoology
vanmete7 at msu.edu
**http://msu.edu/~vanmete7/*
_______________________________________________ R-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models
************************************ Page E. Van Meter Michigan State University Department of Zoology vanmete7 at msu.edu **http://msu.edu/~vanmete7/*