Random intercept and slope model with lmer
[I am taking the liberty of forwarding back to r-sig-mixed-models ... you may feel this is 'too basic', but (as I always tell my classes) there are probably quite a few people lurking on the list who wouldn't mind knowing the answers -- or at least knowing my answers (which may not be "the" answers.] The standard deviations of the random effects are interpretable on the same scale as the corresponding fixed effects, and hence directly comparable. For example, your intercept is approx. 43 (in whatever units); the standard deviation of the variation in intercepts among localities (?) is 47; and the standard deviation of the residual variation among observations is 21. Hence, while the average value at time=0 is strongly different from zero (t-score approx. 7), this difference from zero is quite a bit smaller than the variation among individual observations (think about +/- 2 std. dev.), which is in turn smaller than the variation among localities. The other random effect (time|localidad) describes the variation in slope among localities (a similar comparison to that above applies to the strongly negative average slope with great variation in slopes among localities). However, there is also something a bit funny with your model, because the correlation between the random effects is listed as being -1: the random variation in slopes and intercepts is perfectly (negatively) correlated. Possibly your experimental/observational design is insufficient (you only have an average of about 4 observations per group); it might also help to center your time variable at the midpoint time. I also think that looking at Ch. 4 of Bates's book draft <http://lme4.r-forge.r-project.org/book/Ch4.pdf>, or at the equivalent examples (Orthodont etc.) in PB2000, would be helpful. cheers Ben
Manuel Sp?nola wrote:
Dear Ben, Sorry to bother you with this again, but what do you look for at the output of a mixed model in R? I know what to do with the fixed effect, but what about the random effects?:
> modelo7 = lmer(ipa ~ time + (time | localidad), data=ipa) > summary(modelo7)
Linear mixed model fit by REML
Formula: ipa ~ time + (time | localidad)
Data: ipa
AIC BIC logLik deviance REMLdev
1917 1937 -952.4 1913 1905
Random effects:
Groups Name Variance Std.Dev. Corr
localidad (Intercept) 2232.31 47.247
time 545.97 23.366 -1.000
Residual 450.92 21.235
Number of obs: 196, groups: localidad, 49
Fixed effects:
Estimate Std. Error t value
(Intercept) 42.852 6.918 6.194
time -19.746 3.603 -5.480
Correlation of Fixed Effects:
(Intr)
time -0.904
Thank you very much in advance.
Best,
Manuel
Ben Bolker wrote:
Manuel Sp?nola wrote:
Dear Ben, I am trying to fit a random intercept and slope model with lme4 using function lmer. Is my formulation correct?
> names(ipa)
[1] "localidad" "time" "ipa"
> modelo7 = lmer(ipa ~ time + (time | localidad), data=ipa)
Thank you very much in advance.
Best,
Manuel
That looks reasonable. See http://lme4.r-forge.r-project.org/book/ especially chapter 4. (Why not send these questions to r-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org ?)
Ben Bolker Associate professor, Biology Dep't, Univ. of Florida bolker at ufl.edu / people.biology.ufl.edu/bolker GPG key: people.biology.ufl.edu/bolker/benbolker-publickey.asc