This is not surprising, as allFit() uses update(), which tries to
re-evaluate the function ... at the very least allFit needs a
documentation update with that hint ... (I also notice at a glance that
the allFit docs seem to be incomplete anyway).
If you say more about your workflow we might be able to find a way to
help. (If your workflow is this simple then the answer would be "well
then don't delete theta" ...)
cheers
Ben Bolker
On 2019-08-08 9:06 a.m., Gerrit Eichner wrote:
Dear lmer-experts,
if I refit a fitted model with all available optimizers AFTER
removing the object which contains the starting values for the
parameters of the model as in
theta <- c(1, 0.01, 0.2)
fm <- lmer(Reaction ~ Days + (Days | Subject), data = sleepstudy,
?????????? start = theta)
rm(theta)
allFit(fm, verbose = FALSE)
none of the optimizers succeeds:
original model:
Reaction ~ Days + (Days | Subject)
optimizers (7): bobyqa, Nelder_Mead, nlminbwrap, nmkbw, optimx.L-BFGS-B,
nloptwrap.NLOPT_LN_N...
7 optimizer(s) failed
differences in negative log-likelihoods:
max= -Inf ; std dev= NA
Warning messages:
1: In min(nllvec) : no non-missing arguments to min; returning Inf
2: In max(nllvec - min(nllvec)) :
? no non-missing arguments to max; returning -Inf
If I don't remove theta from my workspace everything works fine.
Is there a workaround for this - from my perspective - unwanted
behaviour? (I have situations where allFit is used in a different
environment from the one wherein the model was fit, e.g., after
fitting the model the object which contains the fit is saved and
later loaded in another R-session to be processed by allFit.)
I could, of course, save theta everytime as well ... Any ideas?
?Best regards? --? Gerrit
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Gerrit Eichner?????????????????? Mathematical Institute, Room 212
gerrit.eichner at math.uni-giessen.de?? Justus-Liebig-University Giessen
Tel: +49-(0)641-99-32104????????? Arndtstr. 2, 35392 Giessen, Germany
http://www.uni-giessen.de/eichner