Interpretation of odd error variances in glmer
On Thu, Nov 19 2009, Douglas Bates wrote:
It is quite legitimate for the ML estimates of a variance component to be zero. It simply means that there is not enough variability accounted for by that term to warrant incorporating the term.
Thanks for the swift response.
Given that the estimate seems to be exactly zero, can I read your answer
to say that the term has somehow been dropped by the algorithm?
I've investigated a bit more and find that the zero variance seems to
occur with the combination of the inclusion of a department-level
covariate (depfemr), and the cross-classifying individual-level random
effect (ulid):
Cross-classified model without dept-level covariate:
Generalized linear mixed model fit by the Laplace approximation
Formula: gradeA ~ 1 + cao + gender * yr0 + modsize + (1 | deptno) + (1 | modinst) + (1 | ulid)
AIC BIC logLik deviance
13379 13457 -6681 13361
Random effects:
Groups Name Variance Std.Dev.
modinst (Intercept) 1.55918 1.24867
ulid (Intercept) 2.23646 1.49548
deptno (Intercept) 0.37642 0.61353
Number of obs: 43955, groups: modinst, 9686; ulid, 1850; deptno, 28
Cross-classified model with dept-level covariate added:
Generalized linear mixed model fit by the Laplace approximation
Formula: gradeA ~ 1 + cao + gender * yr0 + modsize + depfemr + (1 | deptno) + (1 | modinst) + (1 | ulid)
AIC BIC logLik deviance
13301 13388 -6640 13281
Random effects:
Groups Name Variance Std.Dev.
modinst (Intercept) 3.7718 1.9421
ulid (Intercept) 2.4429 1.5630
deptno (Intercept) 0.0000 0.0000
Number of obs: 43955, groups: modinst, 9686; ulid, 1850; deptno, 28
Brendan
Brendan Halpin, Department of Sociology, University of Limerick, Ireland Tel: w +353-61-213147 f +353-61-202569 h +353-61-338562; Room F2-025 x 3147 mailto:brendan.halpin at ul.ie http://www.ul.ie/sociology/brendan.halpin.html