Skip to content
Prev 3044 / 20628 Next

Interpretation of odd error variances in glmer

On Thu, Nov 19 2009, Douglas Bates wrote:

            
Thanks for the swift response.

Given that the estimate seems to be exactly zero, can I read your answer
to say that the term has somehow been dropped by the algorithm?


I've investigated a bit more and find that the zero variance seems to
occur with the combination of the inclusion of a department-level
covariate (depfemr), and the cross-classifying individual-level random
effect (ulid):


Cross-classified model without dept-level covariate: 

    Generalized linear mixed model fit by the Laplace approximation 
    Formula: gradeA ~ 1 + cao + gender * yr0 + modsize + (1 | deptno) + (1 | modinst) + (1 | ulid) 
       AIC   BIC logLik deviance
     13379 13457  -6681    13361
    Random effects:
     Groups  Name        Variance Std.Dev.
     modinst (Intercept) 1.55918  1.24867 
     ulid    (Intercept) 2.23646  1.49548 
     deptno  (Intercept) 0.37642  0.61353 
    Number of obs: 43955, groups: modinst, 9686; ulid, 1850; deptno, 28
    
    
Cross-classified model with dept-level covariate added:

    Generalized linear mixed model fit by the Laplace approximation 
    Formula: gradeA ~ 1 + cao + gender * yr0 + modsize + depfemr + (1 | deptno) + (1 | modinst) + (1 | ulid) 
       AIC   BIC logLik deviance
     13301 13388  -6640    13281
    Random effects:
     Groups  Name        Variance Std.Dev.
     modinst (Intercept) 3.7718   1.9421  
     ulid    (Intercept) 2.4429   1.5630  
     deptno  (Intercept) 0.0000   0.0000  
    Number of obs: 43955, groups: modinst, 9686; ulid, 1850; deptno, 28


Brendan
Message-ID: <87pr7ezj7f.fsf@wivenhoe.ul.ie>
In-Reply-To: <40e66e0b0911181924p7803e316j6dcf752cb75e79ad@mail.gmail.com> (Douglas Bates's message of "Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:24:35 -0600")