Skip to content
Prev 13864 / 20628 Next

Hierarchical structure for preservation of observations

Dear Jacob,

The random effect specification is correct for the model that you have in
mind.

I'd rather think of the effects of site and genus as crossed rather nested.
The formula would become (1|Site) + (1|Genus). Assuming that you have 5 or
more genera. If not, then it better to add Genus to the fixed effects or
keep your current model.

I'm a bit worried about the complexity of your model. 65 observations is
not a lot for a model with 6 parameters.

Best regards,

ir. Thierry Onkelinx
Instituut voor natuur- en bosonderzoek / Research Institute for Nature and
Forest
team Biometrie & Kwaliteitszorg / team Biometrics & Quality Assurance
Kliniekstraat 25
1070 Anderlecht
Belgium

To call in the statistician after the experiment is done may be no more
than asking him to perform a post-mortem examination: he may be able to say
what the experiment died of. ~ Sir Ronald Aylmer Fisher
The plural of anecdote is not data. ~ Roger Brinner
The combination of some data and an aching desire for an answer does not
ensure that a reasonable answer can be extracted from a given body of data.
~ John Tukey

2015-10-18 16:02 GMT+02:00 Jacob Bukoski <jbukoski1 at gmail.com>: