Skip to content
Prev 13003 / 20628 Next

Best way to handle missing data?

On 28 February 2015 at 07:00, Bonnie Dixon <bmdixon at ucdavis.edu> wrote:

            
Others claim 20, and that seems to be more than sufficient for a lot of
problems. It will depend on what proportion of your data is missing, and
how dependent the outcome is on these. As you generally can't have too many
then I would start with say 20 and then try a couple of larger number and
if there is no change then 20 was sufficient.