Science Fair data
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:41 PM, Doug Adams <dougadams53 at gmail.com> wrote:
you want ... lmer(score ~ division + (1|district/school), data=Age6m) and not lmer(score ~ division + (1|school|district), data=Age6m) You want school nested within district correct? The first line specifies that. Or maybe you really wanted ... lmer(score ~ division + (1|school + district), data=Age6m)
Thanks; I think that makes sense.
Well, actually it doesn't. If you tried that it would fail because there is no addition operator for factors.
What's the difference between listing your factors as:
lmer(score ~ division + (1|district/school), data=Age6m)
In this model the effects of the district and the school are modeled with random effects. The model specification is equivalent to lmer(score ~ division + (1|district) + (1|school:district), Age6m) and, if the levels of school are distinct (i.e. you don't have a school 1 in both district 1 and district 2 or something like that), then the specification is equivalent to lmer(score ~ division + (1|district) + (1|school), Age6m)
and lmer(score ~ division + (1|school) + district, data=Age6m)
In this model the effect of the school is modeled by random effects but the effect of the district is modeled by fixed-effects parameters. The choice of fixed effects or random effects depends on the structure of the data and the type of inferences you wish to make. If you have data from only some of the school districts and you wish to form conclusions about a generic district then random effects are preferred. If you have data from all districts and you want to reach conclusions only about those specific districts then fixed effects are preferred. If you want to consider how the variability in the responses splits into student-to-student variability and school-to-school variability and district-to-district variability then random effects are preferred.
since district is another level? ?Sorry if that question is quite 'newbie.' ? : ) Doug
_______________________________________________ R-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models