Skip to content
Prev 15731 / 20628 Next

nAGQ = 0

On 04/09/17 10:51, Poe, John wrote:
<SNIP>
<SNIP>

I remember a quote from some Brit comedy series (it starred the bloke 
who played Terry on "Minder"):  "My mother always said that you should 
try anything once, except for incest and Morris dancing.  She was right 
about the Morris dancing."

On that basis I decided to try using brms.  I installed the package from 
CRAN with no real problems, although there were some slightly worrying 
and highly technical warnings from "rstan" --- I think:
Then I read the vignette brms_overview a bit, and plunged in with trying 
to fit a model.  Needless to say, the attempt didn't get much past 
square zero.  I tried it again with my artificial simulated data that I 
talked about in the post that started off this train of craziness (it 
elicited the suggestion from Tony Ives that I try using nAGQ=0).  The 
result was the same --- square zero + epsilon:
.
     .
     .
Since I'm flying completely blind here (no idea WTF I'm doing) I have 
come to a shuddering halt.

I have attached my function "artSim.R" to generate the artificial data,
and a script to source to effect the call to brm() that I used.

If some kind mixed models guru could take a look and point out to me 
just what bit of egregious stupidity I am committing, I'd be ever so 
humbly grateful.  I don't know from Bayesian stuff (priors, and like 
that) at all, so it's likely to be something pretty stupid and pretty 
simple in the first instance.

cheers,

Rolf Turner