Query
Thank you very much. Do you know if in this design the interaction should estimate with Testlines or with Checks? Best regards, Ezequiel Rossi
De: Doran, Harold <HDoran at air.org>
Enviado: jueves, 14 de septiembre de 2017 12:49 p.m. Para: 'EZEQUIEL ROSSI'; Jake Westfall Cc: r-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org Asunto: RE: [R-sig-ME] Query In the fixed portion of the model, you would use the typical R conventions of ?:? or ?*?. So, as an example, x1:x2 on the RHS gives only the interaction between two variables and then the use of x1 * x2 gives both the interaction and main effects. From: EZEQUIEL ROSSI [mailto:EZEQUIEL_455 at hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2017 8:04 AM To: Doran, Harold <HDoran at air.org>; Jake Westfall <jake.a.westfall at gmail.com> Cc: r-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org Subject: Re: [R-sig-ME] Query Thank you so much for your response. One question more. I need estimate the interaction genotype x environment. How should I make this? The interaction between Checks and environment or between Testlines and environments? Best regards, Ezequiel Rossi ________________________________ De: Doran, Harold <HDoran at air.org<mailto:HDoran at air.org>> Enviado: mi?rcoles, 13 de septiembre de 2017 04:20 p.m. Para: 'EZEQUIEL ROSSI'; Jake Westfall Cc: r-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org<mailto:r-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org> Asunto: RE: [R-sig-ME] Query I can think of a few ways to do this; but perhaps a straightforward way is to estimate environment in a slightly different way than what you have below lmer(Alt_Planta ~ 1 + (1|Environment) + (1|Bloque) + Checks + (1|Testlines), data = data) This will give you the marginal variance between environments and then you can get the conditional variance of the conditional mean for each environment. From: EZEQUIEL ROSSI [mailto:EZEQUIEL_455 at hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2017 3:05 PM To: Jake Westfall <jake.a.westfall at gmail.com<mailto:jake.a.westfall at gmail.com>>; Doran, Harold <HDoran at air.org<mailto:HDoran at air.org>> Cc: r-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org<mailto:r-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org> Subject: Re: [R-sig-ME] Query My model is the follow: lmer(Alt_Planta ~ Environment + (1|Bloque) + Checks + (1|Testlines), data = data) where I have two environment and in each environment the design was a randomized complete block design with 3 replications for the Checks (30 genotypes) and the Testlines had one replications. I need estimate the variance components for each environment and across environment. If you can help me with this, I will thank him very much. Thank you very much, Best regards, Ezequiel Rossi ________________________________________ De: R-sig-mixed-models <r-sig-mixed-models-bounces at r-project.org<mailto:r-sig-mixed-models-bounces at r-project.org>> en nombre de Jake Westfall <jake.a.westfall at gmail.com<mailto:jake.a.westfall at gmail.com>> Enviado: mi?rcoles, 13 de septiembre de 2017 03:46 p.m. Para: Doran, Harold Cc: r-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org<mailto:r-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org> Asunto: Re: [R-sig-ME] Query Well in the old ANOVA-based mixed model framework we talk about interactions between fixed and random factors, although in modern mixed models we call those interactions "random slopes." (The coefficient for a fixed predictor X "depends on" the level of the random factor.) So Ezequiel could just be using the ANOVA-type terminology (used a lot in DoE) to refer to random slopes. Jake On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 1:41 PM, Doran, Harold <HDoran at air.org<mailto:HDoran at air.org>> wrote: > Perhaps a bit OT, but what *is* an interaction between a fixed and random > factor? The fixed effects are estimates, BLUPs are not estimates really. > > I can't quite consider what the estimand is in this instance > > -----Original Message----- > From: R-sig-mixed-models [mailto:r-sig-mixed-models-bounces at r-project.org] > On Behalf Of Ben Bolker > Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2017 2:34 PM > To: r-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org<mailto:r-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org> > Subject: Re: [R-sig-ME] Query > > > I'm going to say something here to get the conversation started, but > this information comes with a giant caveat. I hope that someone with more > knowledge of experimental designs comes forward ... > > in general an interaction between a random factor r and a fixed factor f > is either > > (1|r:f) > > (assuming a positive, compound-symmetric variance-covariance matrix) or > > (f|r) > > (assuming an unstructured variance-covariance matrix). The latter is > likely to be very expensive if f has more than a few levels. > > Interaction between two random factors would be (1|r1:r2) (you would > have (1|r1) and (1|r2) in the model as well). > > On 17-09-13 02:12 PM, EZEQUIEL ROSSI wrote: > > Dears, > > > > > > I am working with a Federer's augmented block design in lmer function > > and I need indicate interaction between ramdom and fixed factors and > > between two ramdom factors . Can you say me how I should make this? > > > > > > Thank you very much, > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > Ezequiel Rossi > > > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > > > _______________________________________________ > > R-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org<mailto:R-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org> mailing list > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models > > > > _______________________________________________ > R-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org<mailto:R-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org> mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models > > _______________________________________________ > R-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org<mailto:R-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org> mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] _______________________________________________ R-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org<mailto:R-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org> mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models