Skip to content

Model comparison using BIC, AIC, -2Log

1 message · Mike Dunbar

#
Hi Luis

I'm not really qualified to comment on this, but I don't think that deciding whether to make an effect fixed or random is a statistical model selection issue. Given that there are issues trying to compare nested models correctly, I can see problems. It's more philosophical, either may be right depending on what you use your model for. Are the levels of A drawn from a larger sample of levels for which you want to make inferences? One issue that may arise is that for factors that are strictly speaking fixed but have alot of levels, it may be easier from a modelling perspective to consider as random. Also you might want to look at some of the papers by Andrew Gelman.

regards

Mike
Thanks Mike... and I thought it would have a single answer... I glanced
over the link you provided; it will take me some time to digest it. My
current problem is comparing a model with variable A as random effect vs
a model with variable A as fixed effect. It gets vary confusing. Thanks
again. Luis
On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 09:28 +0100, Mike Dunbar wrote:
-- 

**+----------------------------------------------------+
              *Luis O. Tedeschi, PhD, PAS
                 Assistant Professor
                 Texas A&M University

230 Kleberg Center               p. (+1) 979-845-5065
2471 TAMU                        f. (+1) 979-845-5292
College Station, TX 77843-2471

*http://nutritionmodels.tamu.edu
http://nutr.tamu.edu 
http://people.tamu.edu/~luis.tedeschi 
+----------------------------------------------------+