Skip to content

problems with allocate memory

2 messages · cumuluss at web.de, Douglas Bates

#
Hi Douglas,

thank you for your reply. But it sounds not that good for me. Could you please suggest me something what I could do more or maybe different. You said: There are no simple solutions at present. Is there a complicated available which I could try?
In the third part of your answer where you mentioned Andrew Runnalls and the ?reimplementing of R? Could this also be helpful for my non fitting models problem or is this for opening the model results issue only?

Best
Paul


-------- Original-Nachricht --------
#
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 5:03 PM, <cumuluss at web.de> wrote:
By "no easy solutions" I mean that I can't think of any approach that
doesn't involve reimplementing the code from scratch, which would
definitely take a long time.  Consider how long we have been working
on getting a 1.0 version of lme4 :-)

I am not sure if Andrew's CXXR implementation of R would be more
effective or not.  I think it has a better garbage collection scheme
but I haven't tried it and I don't know if lme4 would build in that
system.  I have an item on the "ToDo" list to try it but I have a lot
of items on the "ToDo" list.

Basically you will need to use a simpler model or fit to a sample of
your data or wait for R-core to determine if it is possible to use
64-bit indices for atomic R vectors.