Please keep the list in CC. As Ben Bolker mentioned in his reply: for most things, the assumptions carry over from the non-mixed case and the graphical diagnostics are done the same way. I would in general avoid explicit statistical tests of model assumptions (e.g. various tests of normality) because, like all tests, they have failure modes (especially related to sensitivity and specificity) and don't actually tell you what any potential violation of assumptions is doing to your statistical procedure. For multicollinearity, there is one additional diagnostic that lme4 gives you in its summary output, namely the correlation of fixed effects. The exact meaning of this is perhaps a little technical (https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-mixed-models/2009q1/001941.html), but in practical terms a high correlation suggests that there may be multicollinearity. Multicollinearity also tends to show itself in inflated standard errors (in the fixed effects), much as it does for standard linear regression. Regarding independence of errors: I find that to be an assumption that is often best checked by knowing something about your data generating process. For example, there may be some autocorrelation in the errors between observations due to the way data are collected. Best, Phillip
On 26/8/19 2:23 pm, Katharina Tostmann wrote:
Hello Phillip,
Yes, I know it is a very big question about the assumptions in general.
At this time I got a little information about linearity, normal
distibution and variance homogenity. But what ist about
mulitcollinearity and independency? Do you have any idea to check this
in a multilevel context?
Thank you in advance.
best regards from Germany
Katharina
Am Mo., 26. Aug. 2019 um 14:14?Uhr schrieb Phillip Alday
<phillip.alday at mpi.nl <mailto:phillip.alday at mpi.nl>>:
This is a rather open-ended request -- you're more likely to get helpful
advice if you're a bit more specific. For example, which model
assumptions do you want to test in particular? What do your data look
like? Which assumptions do you think your data might violate? Why do you
want to explicitly test assumptions? (e.g. Are you worried about
inflated Type-I error? Often it's better to worry less about assumptions
per se and instead focus on "does my model capture the relevant aspects
of my data?")
Phillip
On 24/8/19 11:08 am, Katharina Tostmann wrote:
> Hello together,
>
> I'm calculating a multi-level analysis in R. However, I do not
understand
> how to test the model assumptions. In my second hypothesis I also
have a
> mediation with, whereby I also have no idea how to test the model
> assumptions.
> Can anyone help here? Thank you and best regards
>
> Katharina
>
>? ? ? ?[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> _______________________________________________
> R-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org
<mailto:R-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org> mailing list