I'm interested in fitting a multivariate meta-analysis model with correlated measurement error. This means fixing the error to a covariance matrix per row. I saw this post <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-mixed-models/2013q2/020180.html> on the mailing list about non-correlated outcomes, but the noise correlation is too large to ignore in my use case. Professor Hadfield implies in the post that it is possible but "complicated". Does anyone know how to do it? Thanks! Jon Bischof
MCMCglmm multivariate meta-analysis with covariance
2 messages · Jon Bischof, Viechtbauer Wolfgang (STAT)
For ML/REML estimation, you can also use metafor, mvmeta, and metaSEM. An illustration of a multivariate meta-analysis with the metafor package can be found here: http://www.metafor-project.org/doku.php/analyses:berkey1998 Best, Wolfgang
Wolfgang Viechtbauer, Ph.D., Statistician | Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology | Maastricht University | P.O. Box 616 (VIJV1) | 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands | +31 (43) 388-4170 | http://www.wvbauer.com > -----Original Message----- > From: R-sig-mixed-models [mailto:r-sig-mixed-models-bounces at r- > project.org] On Behalf Of Jon Bischof > Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 03:25 > To: r-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org > Subject: [R-sig-ME] MCMCglmm multivariate meta-analysis with covariance > > I'm interested in fitting a multivariate meta-analysis model with > correlated measurement error. This means fixing the error to a covariance > matrix per row. > > I saw this post > <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-mixed-models/2013q2/020180.html> on > the mailing list about non-correlated outcomes, but the noise correlation > is too large to ignore in my use case. Professor Hadfield implies in the > post that it is possible but "complicated". Does anyone know how to do > it? > > Thanks! > Jon Bischof