An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-mixed-models/attachments/20120203/8326c69b/attachment-0001.pl>
lme capable of running with missing data?
5 messages · Charles Determan Jr, Baldwin, Jim -FS
I think the only way to resolve this is to provide a specific example. Jim Baldwin Station Statistician USDA Forest Service Albany, California -----Original Message----- From: r-sig-mixed-models-bounces at r-project.org [mailto:r-sig-mixed-models-bounces at r-project.org] On Behalf Of Charles Determan Jr Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 7:18 AM To: Thompson,Paul; r-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org Subject: Re: [R-sig-ME] lme capable of running with missing data? So, is there a way in which I can alter the design matrix so the mixed model will work or is this something that can only be done in SAS currently? The output from the SAS run did provide Type III fixed effect test values.
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Thompson,Paul < Paul.Thompson at sanfordhealth.org> wrote:
That's interesting. SAS uses the sweep approach (it was in fact
devised by Goodnight). The method used in construction of various
types of SS does allow you to estimate when cells are missing. I would
wonder if Type II SS can be done. Type III (despite the incorrect
statement that they are
illegitimate) and Type IV would work fine. ****
** **
It's really an issue of the manner in which the design matrix is
contructed.****
** **
*From:* Charles Determan Jr [mailto:deter088 at umn.edu]
*Sent:* Friday, February 03, 2012 8:36 AM
*To:* Thompson,Paul; r-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org
*Subject:* Re: [R-sig-ME] lme capable of running with missing
data?****
** **
Thank you Paul, I do appreciate your response and especially your time.
The reason I am so persistent is that I know the prior data I posted
was run in SAS (however I don't have the exact coding although I do
know it was done with PROC MIXED with an unstructured covariance
structure and REML estimation method) and it provided all the
interactions. As such, I have scoured the web and literature as to
how this could be done with the missing data (timepoints as a result
of survival). Perhaps this simply has not yet been done in R and I am
stuck for the time being. None-the-less, I want to be certain before I give up on running this type of analysis in R.
Thanks again,****
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 8:26 AM, Thompson,Paul <
Paul.Thompson at sanfordhealth.org> wrote:****
Charles:
I did suggest the use of specific contrasts to do the analysis with
missing cells. I played around, and just have to admit that this is
not possible. I tried to use standard construction techniques to
produce main effects using contrast coding, and then multiply those to
produce interactions. This does not work. It may be possible to use
orthonormalization and the sweep operator to produce a consistent
estimator, but I ran out of time to work on this.
What you can do is convert the design to a single factor, and do the
analysis with specific contrasts, recognizing that this will not
enable you to get to specific things like interaction effects. To
understand why, consider the situation with a 2 x 2, where one cell is entirely missing.
You have lost 1 df for the design, and the interaction is entirely missing.
You can estimate and test specific contrasts, but you can't even
really test the A factor or the B factor. If Cell(2,2) is missing, you
can test Cell (1,1) v Cell(1,2) and you can test Cell (2,1) v Cell
(1,1), but neither of these is the test of the "main effect" of A or
B. When you have larger designs with 2 or 3 factors, the comparisons
again have fewer df than should be encountered. This means that the
interactions are not defined properly.
Do you NEED the interactions for theoretical purposes, or are they
there simply for completedness? Are the cells missing due to your
design or due to happenstance?
It is the case that fractional factorial designs eliminate cells from
the design to estimate main effects and losing the ability to estimate
interactions. So, missing cells, when planned for appropriately, can
result in appropriate analysis. I am not sure how to run mixed models
with fractional factorials, however.****
-----Original Message-----
From: r-sig-mixed-models-bounces at r-project.org [mailto:
r-sig-mixed-models-bounces at r-project.org] On Behalf Of Charles
Determan Jr
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 7:06 AM
To: r-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org
Subject: [R-sig-ME] lme capable of running with missing data?
Greetings,
Some of you may recognize my name from a few related posts but I just
have general question that perhaps can be clarified. I have read
several times that 'lme' and 'lmer' are techniques capable of running
data sets with missing values. Is this true? I have put up similar
posts where when I try to run a two or three way interaction mixed
model I get an error of singularities or X'X not positive. Does the
data set need to be formatted in some way where the mixed model can be run with all interactions?
Furthermore, if the missing values are 'not missing at random' is
there another method to follow for generating the mixed model? I am
just confused why I see posts that lme can be run when data is missing.
Regards,****
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
_______________________________________________ R-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models ---------------------------------------------------------------------- - Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain privileged and confidential information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.**** ** ** ---------------------------------------------------------------------- - Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain privileged and confidential information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-mixed-models/attachments/20120203/e0b0429b/attachment-0001.pl>
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-mixed-models/attachments/20120203/751cf7c8/attachment-0001.pl>
3 days later
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-mixed-models/attachments/20120206/1ae1e40e/attachment-0001.pl>