Skip to content

pedigreemm number of levels per grouping factor

3 messages · Ben Bolker, Wilson, Alastair

#
On 14-02-04 06:34 PM, Wilson, Alastair wrote:
I'm not sure, but I guess that this is one of the cases where
individual-level random effects *do* make sense in a LMM context.  I
don't know whether pedigreemm allows you to pass arguments through to
lmer, but if it does you can use
control=lmerControl(check.nobs.vs.nlev="ignore") to suppress this check.
 You might also be able to do this globally via

options(lmerControl=list(check.nobs.vs.nlev="ignore"))

  (The maintainer of the package might want to consider suppressing this
check by default, if this is a common issue ...)

  Ben Bolker
It would be nice if the example were reproducible ...
#
Thanks for the suggestion Ben. Sadly it didn't provide a solution. The error message indicates the variance component I am after is unidentifiable, which would not be the case if I have correctly got the random ID effect linked to the pedigree.

Error in .sortCsparse(.Call(dtCMatrix_sparse_solve, a, b)) : 
  Dimensions of system to be solved are inconsistent
In addition: Warning message:
In checkZrank(reTrms$Zt, n = n, control, nonSmall = 1e+06) :
  number of observations <= rank(Z); variance-covariance matrix will be unidentifiable

I'll maybe contact the package maintainer directly unless anyone else has thoughts/experience with pedigreemm.

Alastair


-----Original Message-----
From: r-sig-mixed-models-bounces at r-project.org [mailto:r-sig-mixed-models-bounces at r-project.org] On Behalf Of Ben Bolker
Sent: 05 February 2014 18:35
To: r-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R-sig-ME] pedigreemm number of levels per grouping factor
On 14-02-04 06:34 PM, Wilson, Alastair wrote:
I'm not sure, but I guess that this is one of the cases where individual-level random effects *do* make sense in a LMM context.  I don't know whether pedigreemm allows you to pass arguments through to lmer, but if it does you can use
control=lmerControl(check.nobs.vs.nlev="ignore") to suppress this check.
 You might also be able to do this globally via

options(lmerControl=list(check.nobs.vs.nlev="ignore"))

  (The maintainer of the package might want to consider suppressing this check by default, if this is a common issue ...)

  Ben Bolker
It would be nice if the example were reproducible ...

_______________________________________________
R-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-mixed-models