Skip to content

glmmADMB error messages with percentage cover data (Elwyn Sharps)

3 messages · Highland Statistics Ltd, Elwyn Sharps, Ben Bolker

#
See the help file of glmmadmb:

zeroInflation:   whether a zero-inflated model should be fitted (only 
"poisson" and "nbinom" families).

With emphasis on the last part in this sentence.

Kind regards,


Alain

  
    
#
Hi Alain, Thanks for your reply. Sorry I hadn't noticed this section of the glmmADMB help file and as some of the models were running fine, I assumed there wasn't a problem with the family. Have you got any other ideas on how I can deal with the very large number of zeros in the data? As it's percentage cover rather than count data, I don't think I can use Poisson or Neg Binomial. Thanks again
Elwyn

  
  
#
On 14-11-19 12:16 PM, Elwyn Sharps wrote:
A couple of thoughts:

 + I believe glmmADMB *can* handle zero-inflated binomials (I would try
testing with a simple made-up data set to check that the results are
sensible).

 + does your plant cover variable have a meaningful denominator?  (e.g.,
if you had point-count data with 100 points, or with a known number of
points)  If you're just taking a percentage that's assessed from a
visual impression, or e.g. a measure of area from remote sensing, then
you probably don't have a variable that's actually binomial (or
zero-inflated binomial).  A beta distribution might be more appropriate,
but it too would have to be zero-inflated.

  + errors of the sort you're seeing are due to some sort of an
instability in the model -- might be fixable with a more recent version
of the glmmADMB binary files, which are available but I haven't gotten
around to packaging in a new version yet.
See the help file of glmmadmb: