-----Original Message-----
From: R-sig-mixed-models [mailto:r-sig-mixed-models-bounces at r-
project.org] On Behalf Of Ben Bolker
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2018 2:35 PM
To: r-sig-mixed-models at r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R-sig-ME] z-scores and glht
If someone wanted to work hard enough they could probably work out a
Satterthwaite approximation for the degrees of freedom of these
contrasts ... ?
On 2018-04-25 02:25 PM, Dan Mirman wrote:
For what it's worth, my own experience is that this approximation is
only slightly anti-conservative, so I usually feel comfortable using
Hope that helps,
Dan
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 12:26 PM, Cristiano Alessandro <
cri.alessandro at gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,
something is wrong with my email, so I am sorry for possible multiple
postings.
After fitting a model with lme, I run post-hoc tests with glht. The
results are repored in the following:
lev.ph <- glht(lev.lm, linfct = ph_conditional); summary(lev.ph,
test=adjusted("bonferroni"))
Simultaneous Tests for General Linear Hypotheses
Fit: lme.formula(fixed = data ~ des_days, data = data_red_trf, random
= ~des_days |
ratID, method = "ML", na.action = na.omit, control = lCtr)
Linear Hypotheses:
Estimate Std. Error z value
Pr(>|z|)
des_days1 == 0 3232.2 443.2 7.294 9.05e-13
des_days14 == 0 3356.1 912.2 3.679 0.000702 ***
des_days48 == 0 2688.4 1078.5 2.493 0.038025 *
I am trying to understand the output values. How are the z-scores
If the function uses standard errors, should these be t-statistics
(and not z-scores)?
Thanks for your help, and sorry for the naive question.
Best
Cristiano
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]