Skip to content

Choosing appropriate priors for bglmer mixed models in blme

1 message · Ben Bolker

#
Josie Galbraith <josie.galbraith at ...> writes:
[snip]
If all you're trying to do is deal with complete separation (and not,
e.g. singular estimates of variance components [typically indicated
by zero variances or +/- 1 correlations, although I'm not sure those
are necessary conditions for singularity]), then it should be OK
to put the prior only on the fixed effects.  Generally speaking a
weak prior is one with a standard deviation that is large relative
to the expected scale of the effect (e.g. we might say sigma=10 is
large, but it won't be if the units of measurement are very small
so that a typical value of the mean is 100,000 ...)
This seems fairly reasonable at first glance.  Where were you seeing
the complete separation, though?   I would normally expect to
see at least one of the parameters still being reasonably large
if that's the case.
[snip]
[snip]