In fact, though Chapter 12 still exists in the?TOC of the document, the relevant chapter (Statistical Models in R)?has mysteriously become chapter 11 (it was a long time ago that I last looked at it). The relevant section is ?11.1 Defining statistical models; formulae. http://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/R-intro.html Regards, Mark. ?Mark Difford Ph.D. candidate, Botany Department, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, Port Elizabeth, SA. Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Chapter12?
3 messages · Mark Difford, Peter Dalgaard, Kurt Hornik
Mark Difford wrote:
In fact, though Chapter 12 still exists in the TOC of the document, the relevant chapter (Statistical Models in R) has mysteriously become chapter 11 (it was a long time ago that I last looked at it). The relevant section is ?11.1 Defining statistical models; formulae. http://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/R-intro.html Regards, Mark. Mark Difford Ph.D. candidate, Botany Department, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, Port Elizabeth, SA.
This look like a generic texinfo issue affecting HTML output. Numbered
sections are off by one when the first section (here Preface) is
unnumbered. Same thing in R-exts.html and others.
(CC to Kurt Hornik because he usually knows texinfo things.)
-p
O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard ?ster Farimagsgade 5, Entr.B c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics PO Box 2099, 1014 Cph. K (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918 ~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk) FAX: (+45) 35327907
1 day later
Peter Dalgaard writes:
Mark Difford wrote:
In fact, though Chapter 12 still exists in the TOC of the document, the relevant chapter (Statistical Models in R) has mysteriously become chapter 11 (it was a long time ago that I last looked at it). The relevant section is ?11.1 Defining statistical models; formulae. http://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/R-intro.html Regards, Mark. Mark Difford Ph.D. candidate, Botany Department, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, Port Elizabeth, SA.
This look like a generic texinfo issue affecting HTML output. Numbered sections are off by one when the first section (here Preface) is unnumbered. Same thing in R-exts.html and others.
(CC to Kurt Hornik because he usually knows texinfo things.)
That appears to be a bug in the way makeinfo generates the toc. -k